RE: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to pure ACPI driver

[<Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:platform-driver-x86-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Andy Shevchenko
> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:18 AM
> To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
> Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; AceLan Kao
> <acelan.kao@canonical.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> pali.rohar@gmail.com; Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@Dell.com>; Rafael
> Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH v1] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Convert to pure ACPI driver
> 
> On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 13:37 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 08:26:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Remove code duplication by converting driver to pure ACPI one.
> >
> 
> I have fixed couple issues, but...
> 
> > +Rafael
> >
> > I don't see any reason *not* to do this, it seems the acpi driver
> > model provides
> > some of the boilerplate stuff we were doing manually before as a
> > platform
> > device. I'm scratching my head wondering why we did this as a
> > platform-driver in
> > the first place now...
> 
> ...I still keep in my review queue in a hope that someone can actually
> test this on real hardware.
> 
> --
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Intel Finland Oy

Andy,

I'm pretty sure XPS 9365 can test this.  I was going to try but 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10194503/ was not
able to compile on top of platform-x86/for-next.
That was the only one I saw at patchwork.

drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c:172:11: error: ‘ACPI_BUTTON_CLASS’ undeclared here (not in a function)
  .class = ACPI_BUTTON_CLASS,
           ^
drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c:178:2: error: unknown field ‘driver’ specified in initializer
  .driver = {
  ^
scripts/Makefile.build:316: recipe for target 'drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.o' failed
make[5]: *** [drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.o] Error 1

is that different than the one in your review queue?

Thanks,