From: "Matthew Faulkner" <matthew.faulkner@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:41:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c565abbb0710180841k69045ef6p4373903b9bd1dc7e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710120814.23903.a1426z@gawab.com>
Hey all
I'm using netperf to perform TCP throughput tests via the localhost
interface. This is being done on a SMP machine. I'm forcing the
netperf server and client to run on the same core. However, for any
packet sizes below 523 the throughput is much lower compared to the
throughput when the packet sizes are greater than 524.
Recv Send Send Utilization Service Demand
Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send Recv
Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local remote
bytes bytes bytes secs. MBytes /s % S % S us/KB us/KB
65536 65536 523 30.01 81.49 50.00 50.00 11.984 11.984
65536 65536 524 30.01 460.61 49.99 49.99 2.120 2.120
The chances are i'm being stupid and there is an obvious reason for
this, but when i put the server and client on different cores i don't
see this effect.
Any help explaining this will be greatly appreciated.
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-18 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200710120814.23903.a1426z@gawab.com>
2007-10-18 15:41 ` Matthew Faulkner [this message]
2007-10-11 21:31 Al Boldi
2007-10-12 4:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 5:37 ` Al Boldi
[not found] ` <470F5F19.70606@trash.net>
2007-10-12 12:25 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 12:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 13:18 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 13:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 22:56 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-17 22:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-17 23:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-20 3:40 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-20 4:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-20 11:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-21 4:31 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-21 4:53 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-23 22:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-12 13:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 13:30 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 13:39 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 13:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 14:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 14:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 22:56 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 23:02 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c565abbb0710180841k69045ef6p4373903b9bd1dc7e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=matthew.faulkner@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®