mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matthew Faulkner" <matthew.faulkner@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:41:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c565abbb0710180841k69045ef6p4373903b9bd1dc7e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710120814.23903.a1426z@gawab.com>

Hey all

I'm using netperf to perform TCP throughput tests via the localhost
interface. This is being done on a SMP machine. I'm forcing the
netperf server and client to run on the same core. However, for any
packet sizes below 523 the throughput is much lower compared to the
throughput when the packet sizes are greater than 524.

Recv   Send    Send                          Utilization       Service Demand
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed              Send     Recv     Send    Recv
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput  local    remote   local   remote
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    MBytes  /s  % S      % S      us/KB   us/KB
 65536  65536    523    30.01        81.49   50.00    50.00    11.984  11.984
 65536  65536    524    30.01       460.61   49.99    49.99    2.120   2.120

The chances are i'm being stupid and there is an obvious reason for
this, but when i put  the server and client on different cores i don't
see this effect.

Any help explaining this will be greatly appreciated.

       reply	other threads:[~2007-10-18 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200710120814.23903.a1426z@gawab.com>
2007-10-18 15:41 ` Matthew Faulkner [this message]
2007-10-11 21:31 Al Boldi
2007-10-12  4:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12  5:37   ` Al Boldi
     [not found]     ` <470F5F19.70606@trash.net>
2007-10-12 12:25       ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 12:31         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 13:18           ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 13:23             ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 22:56               ` Al Boldi
2007-10-17 22:37     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-17 23:24       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-20  3:40         ` Al Boldi
2007-10-20  4:47           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-20 11:10             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-21  4:31             ` Al Boldi
2007-10-21  4:53               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-23 22:27               ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-12 13:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 13:30   ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 13:39     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 13:48       ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 14:02         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 14:03           ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 22:56         ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 23:02           ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c565abbb0710180841k69045ef6p4373903b9bd1dc7e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=matthew.faulkner@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®