From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net (009.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6E281F19A; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723136935; cv=none; b=PipeG3BmR0IEx3ZoR9vLPINzd/ABjZCBltOFpESmQJ1iRgxcJph8sfhqk5IGTKO/vjtVGOgYjQy3eYh8bNh9uBws+g+Gh2+xq1E3ukCX5Sf8qmLGJm9k53ITMryGUWL3KkunZyPzoKyJVmX3gKkHlPni7IfBDAVki2bHBexkvS4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723136935; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Dv6UFge+r3fUMfdEDSKZLszG+D/NEMRn3J01gHnBmgY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=RPWBK54hEXe/VQ/R78y4SC6HkiOrX4t0o/flfyb0Pit1c9/zw3VbDiCXGulcNUpIH5z42ky4oNSfy85ubicj4SZo8/MgGT/a+Hl20c5T1Nz2H0t/6NQwBaXGZhA8pleprgXIMRr3CLnWY3ajCxVTVcpVGn0hWFTwqOGMk9uL6PE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=y7lx6KNz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="y7lx6KNz" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Wftmb19R9zlgT1M; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:08:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1723136926; x=1725728927; bh=Dv6UFge+r3fUMfdEDSKZLszG +D/NEMRn3J01gHnBmgY=; b=y7lx6KNzqb0NfcC1pIjtbmKtoufjJc9g9U3fNnD1 yrOpg2Hp7Y18rFnhK+hHvGvZnWh3GBKMSpm/rYszrCl9yChbXU7V63LxQFk//Rxk tp7QV1IerkS81TXNWWtgS8CeHi4eFlZieQW3sPQoKjoSzZzyeP/JlAXwaqN9HcVH /yupARRe+dyaZ6EBWTgniL8XZ19cVVG9kJWILSFLcmDiEayORER7QdKljdymf5KT tZDK71Uc+C0/9azBgnUHCeBDWmIREhLutvn4Ogx1VvFHB6Rn4XH52qgb09yLOJyq c9j8rAd477HNX7fvbQ6hPce/fA1VYstuzZj+W0dg55E8hQ== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (009.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id md2vhGJoIZiq; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.66.154.22] (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WftmX6z5zzlgTGW; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 10:08:43 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: ufs: Add HCI capabilities sysfs group To: Avri Altman , "Martin K . Petersen" Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20240804072109.2330880-1-avri.altman@wdc.com> <20240804072109.2330880-3-avri.altman@wdc.com> <28624a6d-fdc7-4458-8e8f-f8d764cd4b5b@acm.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/8/24 4:32 AM, Avri Altman wrote: > So I am wondering if having something like the below is acceptable? > /sys/devices/platform//ufshci_capabilities This is also fine with me: /sys/devices/platform/.../ufshci_capabilities Thanks, Bart.