From: Lee Duncan <leeman.duncan@gmail.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>,
hare@suse.de, Satish Kharat <satishkh@cisco.com>,
Sesidhar Baddela <sebaddel@cisco.com>,
Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com>,
Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] Revert "scsi: fcoe: Fix potential deadlock on &fip->ctlr_lock"
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:07:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c578cdcd46b60470535c4c4a953e6a1feca0dffd.1707500786.git.lduncan@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1707500786.git.lduncan@suse.com>
From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
This reverts commit 1a1975551943f681772720f639ff42fbaa746212
This commit causes interrupts to be lost for FCoE devices,
since it changed sping locks from "bh" to "irqsave".
Instead, a work queue should be used, and will be addressed
in a separate patch.
Fixes: 1a1975551943 ("scsi: fcoe: Fix potential deadlock on &fip->ctlr_lock")
Signed-off-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
---
drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c | 20 ++++++++------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
index 19eee108db02..5c8d1ba3f8f3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
@@ -319,17 +319,16 @@ static void fcoe_ctlr_announce(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip)
{
struct fcoe_fcf *sel;
struct fcoe_fcf *fcf;
- unsigned long flags;
mutex_lock(&fip->ctlr_mutex);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock);
kfree_skb(fip->flogi_req);
fip->flogi_req = NULL;
list_for_each_entry(fcf, &fip->fcfs, list)
fcf->flogi_sent = 0;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock);
sel = fip->sel_fcf;
if (sel && ether_addr_equal(sel->fcf_mac, fip->dest_addr))
@@ -700,7 +699,6 @@ int fcoe_ctlr_els_send(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip, struct fc_lport *lport,
{
struct fc_frame *fp;
struct fc_frame_header *fh;
- unsigned long flags;
u16 old_xid;
u8 op;
u8 mac[ETH_ALEN];
@@ -734,11 +732,11 @@ int fcoe_ctlr_els_send(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip, struct fc_lport *lport,
op = FIP_DT_FLOGI;
if (fip->mode == FIP_MODE_VN2VN)
break;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock);
kfree_skb(fip->flogi_req);
fip->flogi_req = skb;
fip->flogi_req_send = 1;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock);
schedule_work(&fip->timer_work);
return -EINPROGRESS;
case ELS_FDISC:
@@ -1707,11 +1705,10 @@ static int fcoe_ctlr_flogi_send_locked(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip)
static int fcoe_ctlr_flogi_retry(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip)
{
struct fcoe_fcf *fcf;
- unsigned long flags;
int error;
mutex_lock(&fip->ctlr_mutex);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock);
LIBFCOE_FIP_DBG(fip, "re-sending FLOGI - reselect\n");
fcf = fcoe_ctlr_select(fip);
if (!fcf || fcf->flogi_sent) {
@@ -1722,7 +1719,7 @@ static int fcoe_ctlr_flogi_retry(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip)
fcoe_ctlr_solicit(fip, NULL);
error = fcoe_ctlr_flogi_send_locked(fip);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock);
mutex_unlock(&fip->ctlr_mutex);
return error;
}
@@ -1739,9 +1736,8 @@ static int fcoe_ctlr_flogi_retry(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip)
static void fcoe_ctlr_flogi_send(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip)
{
struct fcoe_fcf *fcf;
- unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock);
fcf = fip->sel_fcf;
if (!fcf || !fip->flogi_req_send)
goto unlock;
@@ -1768,7 +1764,7 @@ static void fcoe_ctlr_flogi_send(struct fcoe_ctlr *fip)
} else /* XXX */
LIBFCOE_FIP_DBG(fip, "No FCF selected - defer send\n");
unlock:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fip->ctlr_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&fip->ctlr_lock);
}
/**
--
2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-09 18:07 [PATCH v4 0/2] Ensure FCoE target interrupts work correctly Lee Duncan
2024-02-09 18:07 ` Lee Duncan [this message]
2024-02-11 13:52 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] Revert "scsi: fcoe: Fix potential deadlock on &fip->ctlr_lock" Hannes Reinecke
2024-02-09 18:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] fnic: move fnic_fnic_flush_tx() to a work queue Lee Duncan
2024-02-13 1:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Ensure FCoE target interrupts work correctly Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c578cdcd46b60470535c4c4a953e6a1feca0dffd.1707500786.git.lduncan@suse.com \
--to=leeman.duncan@gmail.com \
--cc=dg573847474@gmail.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kartilak@cisco.com \
--cc=lduncan@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=satishkh@cisco.com \
--cc=sebaddel@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®