mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	<babu.moger@amd.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
	<peternewman@google.com>, <eranian@google.com>,
	<tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] selftests/resctrl: Add support for MBM and MBA tests on AMD
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:41:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c57f0d76-8fa7-443c-8ba4-2a18eb0ba7fc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261022132517.46805-4-swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>

Hi Swapnil,


> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> index fdbbe2155cea..38cf58c41be1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c


> @@ -233,6 +277,7 @@ static int read_from_mc_dir(char *mc_dir)
>   */
>  static int enumerate_mcs(void)
>  {
> +	int (*read_mc_dir)(char *mc_dir);

Could this be named read_from_mc_dir to avoid the unnecessary churn?

>  	char mc_dir[512], *temp;
>  	struct dirent *ep;
>  	char *sysfs_name;
> @@ -241,6 +286,10 @@ static int enumerate_mcs(void)
>  
>  	if (get_vendor() == ARCH_INTEL) {
>  		sysfs_name = UNCORE_IMC;
> +		read_mc_dir = read_from_intel_mc_dir;
> +	} else if (get_vendor() == ARCH_AMD) {
> +		sysfs_name = AMD_UMC;
> +		read_mc_dir = read_from_amd_mc_dir;
>  	} else {
>  		ksft_print_msg("Unsupported vendor\n");
>  		return -1;

...

  		}
> @@ -335,15 +387,40 @@ static void perf_close_mc_read_mem_bw(void)
>  static int perf_open_mc_read_mem_bw(int cpu_no)
>  {
>  	struct mc_counter_config *mc_counter;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret, opened = 0;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(mc_counter, &mc_counters_list, entry)
>  		mc_counter->fd = -1;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(mc_counter, &mc_counters_list, entry) {
>  		ret = open_perf_read_event(cpu_no, mc_counter);
> -		if (ret)
> -			goto close_fds;
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			opened++;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * On AMD each memory controller (UMC) has its own PMU that is
> +		 * tied to a specific NUMA node, unlike Intel where opening an
> +		 * iMC event on the benchmark CPU always resolves to the local
> +		 * memory controllers. A UMC PMU can only be opened from a CPU
> +		 * that belongs to the same node and returns -ENODEV otherwise.
> +		 * The benchmark runs on a single CPU, so skip the UMCs that
> +		 * belong to remote nodes and measure only the memory
> +		 * controllers local to the benchmark. This matches what
> +		 * mbm_local_bytes accounts for on the resctrl side.
> +		 */
> +		if (ret == -ENODEV && get_vendor() == ARCH_AMD)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ksft_print_msg("Error opening memory bandwidth performance counter: %s\n",
> +			       strerror(-ret));
> +		goto close_fds;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!opened) {
> +		ksft_print_msg("Could not open any memory controller counters\n");
> +		goto close_fds;
>  	}

As the comment above highlights, the test runs on a single CPU. It is thus not
possible for the test to change which MC it needs to obtain data from. 
perf_open_mc_read_mem_bw() is called several times during the test run and
repeated attempts at accessing MC that are known to fail is unnecessary. 
Considering that -ENODEV can be relied on to indicate that the MC is not
valid for the test run, could it instead be used to drop that MC from
mc_counters_list? This will avoid the subsequent unnecessary attempts at
accessing these MC and also simplify the users that walk mc_counters_list
during the test run since they can continue to rely on all MC being valid
without needing to keep checking if the fd is valid.

I suggest switching the list_for_each_entry() to list_for_each_entry_safe()
and drop the MC's from the list on ENODEV. This also eliminates the need for the
"opened" tracking that can be replaced with a list_empty(&mc_counters_list).

>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -363,14 +440,20 @@ static void do_mc_read_mem_bw_test(void)
>  {
>  	struct mc_counter_config *mc_counter;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(mc_counter, &mc_counters_list, entry)
> +	list_for_each_entry(mc_counter, &mc_counters_list, entry) {
> +		if (mc_counter->fd == -1)
> +			continue;
>  		read_mem_bw_ioctl_perf_event_ioc_reset_enable(mc_counter);
> +	}
>  
>  	sleep(1);
>  
>  	/* Stop counters after a second to get results. */
> -	list_for_each_entry(mc_counter, &mc_counters_list, entry)
> +	list_for_each_entry(mc_counter, &mc_counters_list, entry) {
> +		if (mc_counter->fd == -1)
> +			continue;
>  		read_mem_bw_ioctl_perf_event_ioc_disable(mc_counter);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -395,6 +478,10 @@ static int get_read_mem_bw_mc(float *bw_mc)
>  	list_for_each_entry(r, &mc_counters_list, entry) {
>  		struct membw_read_format measurement;
>  
> +		/* Skip memory controllers that were not opened (remote node). */
> +		if (r->fd == -1)
> +			continue;
> +
>  		if (read(r->fd, &measurement, sizeof(measurement)) == -1) {
>  			ksft_perror("Couldn't get read bandwidth through MC");
>  			return -1;

With unusable MC dropped from mc_counters_list all the above fd checks are
unnecessary.

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-28 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-22 13:25 [PATCH v5 0/5] selftests/resctrl: Add MBM and MBA test support for AMD Swapnil Sapkal
2026-10-22 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] selftests/resctrl: Rename variables and functions to generic names Swapnil Sapkal
2026-10-28 18:38   ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-22 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] selftests/resctrl: Detect vendor to select memory controller sysfs name Swapnil Sapkal
2026-10-28 18:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-22 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] selftests/resctrl: Add support for MBM and MBA tests on AMD Swapnil Sapkal
2026-10-28 18:41   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2026-10-22 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] selftests/resctrl: Use bandwidth values for AMD MBA schemata Swapnil Sapkal
2026-10-28 18:45   ` Reinette Chatre
2026-10-22 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] selftests/resctrl: Enable MBM and MBA tests on AMD Swapnil Sapkal
2026-10-28 18:45   ` Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c57f0d76-8fa7-443c-8ba4-2a18eb0ba7fc@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®