Re: [PATCH] x86/platform/uv: make const pointer dots a static const array

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 13:34 -0600, Steve Wahl wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 05:03:20PM +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > Don't populate the const array dots on the stack
[]
> Examination of the disassembly shows that the compiler actually
> eliminates the creation of the pointer "dots" on the stack and just
> passes the address of the string constant to the printk function.
> 
> So this change should not have any actual effect (I don't know where
> you got the "shrinks object code" from), and in my humble opinion
> makes the code less clear.

Probably shrinks an allmodconfig where the symbols are referenced.
It probably doesn't do anything to a defconfig.

> As such, unless there's something here I don't understand, I vote to
> reject this patch.
[]
> > but make it static
> > const and make the pointer an array to remove a dereference. Shrinks
> > object code a few bytes too.
[]
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_nmi.c
[]
> > @@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ static void uv_nmi_dump_cpu_ip(int cpu, struct pt_regs *regs)
> >   */
> >  static void uv_nmi_dump_state_cpu(int cpu, struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> > -	const char *dots = " ................................. ";
> > +	static const char dots[] = " ................................. ";