mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Faruque Ansari <faruque.ansari@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
	Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
	avaneesh.dwivedi@oss.qualcomm.com,
	Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Francesco Valla <francesco@valla.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 5/6] power: reset: Introduce PSCR Recording Framework for Non-Volatile Storage
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 17:56:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5b6538b-98f0-4feb-81bf-531b9d350654@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ar90GoaxTV8pjonY@mai.linaro.org>

Hi Daniel Lezcano,

On 02-Oct-26 2:36 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:38:46PM +0530, Faruque Ansari wrote:
>> Introduce the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) framework: a
>> generic mechanism to record why the last power state change (shutdown or
>> reboot) happened - under-voltage, thermal, watchdog, software-triggered,
>> etc. - so a postmortem reason survives a reboot or an abrupt power loss.
>>
>> PSCRR is built around providers. A provider is either a hardware reason
>> source (a PMIC, SoC reset controller or watchdog exposing a reset cause)
>> or a recorder that persists the reason across a power cycle (an NVMEM or
>> RTC scratch cell). Each provider gets a directory under
>> /sys/kernel/pscrr/providerN/ exposing its name, backing device, the set
>> of observed reasons (as tokens), its capabilities, the reasons it
>> supports and - for recorders - a record policy. The reason set is
>> deliberately not collapsed to a single winning cause, since resets are
>> often multi-causal.
>>
>> Reasons are the numeric enum psc_reason values from reboot.h, shared with
>> the POWER_ON_REASON_* vocabulary, so they store compactly in small
>> battery-backed cells. The current reason (get/set_psc_reason(), set by
>> the thermal/regulator/hw_protection paths) is written to every recorder
>> from the reboot notifier.
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> +menuconfig PSCRR
>> +	bool "Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) Framework"
>> +	depends on POWER_RESET
>> +	help
>> +	  Enables the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) framework.
>> +
>> +	  PSCRR records why the system last shut down or rebooted into
>> +	  non-volatile storage, so the reason survives the reset and can be
>> +	  read by the bootloader or early user space on the next boot. Reasons
>> +	  come from software (thermal or regulator hardware-protection events,
>> +	  a watchdog pretimeout, a kernel panic, a controlled reboot) or from
>> +	  hardware reset-cause registers (PMIC, SoC reset controller, watchdog).
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> +static int pscrr_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> +				 unsigned long action, void *unused)
>> +{
>> +	guard(mutex)(&pscrr_lock);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * A reboot, halt or power-off that reaches here with no more specific
>> +	 * reason is software-initiated by definition. Record it as such rather
>> +	 * than leaving it unattributed; a real cause set earlier (thermal,
>> +	 * under-voltage, ...) is already latched and left untouched.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (get_psc_reason() == PSCR_UNKNOWN)
>> +		set_psc_reason(PSCR_SOFTWARE);
>> +
>> +	pscrr_record_current();
>> +
>> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct notifier_block pscrr_reboot_nb = {
>> +	.notifier_call = pscrr_reboot_notifier,
>> +};
> 
> I'm worried about the mechanism. The call to set_psc_reason() sets a
> global variable and pscrr_record_current() write its value to the
> NVMEM backend.
> 
> That is done from the reboot notifier.
> 
> Is this notifier called in all cases, eg. watchdog reset or emergency
> reboot ? It sounds possible the reason is set but then the notifier is
> not called thus not written in the non-volatile medium, no ?

Ack.
Thanks for your review.

You're right. The current core series reliably records only 
orderly reboot/shutdown paths via the reboot notifier chain; 
emergency_restart() bypasses it, so the reason may be set but not 
recorded.

Panic-driven emergency reboots (e.g. sysrq-c and watchdog 
pretimeout panic) are addressed by my follow-up v3 series [1], 
which records the reset cause via panic_notifier_list before 
panic() reaches emergency_restart().

For true hardware resets (e.g. watchdog bite, brownout, or 
external reset), no Linux code executes, so software recording is 
not possible. Those cases are expected to be handled by PMIC/SoC 
reset-cause providers on the subsequent boot. The PMIC 
reset-cause provider is planned to be posted as a separate series 
once NVMEM provider support is accepted.

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260804-pscrr-reboot-reason-v3-0-e706dbfc7465@oss.qualcomm.com/

Thanks,
Faruque Ansari

> 
> [ ... ]


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-21 17:44 [PATCH v14 0/6] power: reset: Introduce the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) framework Faruque Ansari
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 1/6] power: Extend power_on_reason.h for upcoming PSCRR framework Faruque Ansari
2026-09-22  6:02   ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 2/6] reboot: hw_protection_trigger: use standardized numeric shutdown/reboot reasons instead of strings Faruque Ansari
2026-10-02  7:47   ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-10-05 12:27     ` Faruque Ansari
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 3/6] reboot: add parsable tokens for power state change reasons Faruque Ansari
2026-09-22  7:37   ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-23 11:05     ` Faruque Ansari
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 4/6] reboot: extend psc_reason with power-on and reset causes Faruque Ansari
2026-09-22  7:45   ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-23 11:05     ` Faruque Ansari
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 5/6] power: reset: Introduce PSCR Recording Framework for Non-Volatile Storage Faruque Ansari
2026-09-22  9:03   ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-23 11:06     ` Faruque Ansari
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 6/6] Documentation: Add sysfs documentation for PSCRR Faruque Ansari
2026-09-22  9:12   ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-22  6:33 ` [PATCH v14 0/6] power: reset: Introduce the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) framework Bradley Morgan
2026-09-22  6:44   ` Faruque Ansari
2026-09-24  7:08 ` [PATCH v15 " Faruque Ansari
2026-09-24  7:08   ` [PATCH v15 1/6] power: Extend power_on_reason.h for upcoming PSCRR framework Faruque Ansari
2026-10-01 20:22     ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-10-02  4:22       ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-10-02  7:07     ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-09-24  7:08   ` [PATCH v15 2/6] reboot: hw_protection_trigger: use standardized numeric shutdown/reboot reasons instead of strings Faruque Ansari
2026-09-24  7:08   ` [PATCH v15 3/6] reboot: add parsable tokens for power state change reasons Faruque Ansari
2026-10-02  7:53     ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-09-24  7:08   ` [PATCH v15 4/6] reboot: extend psc_reason with power-on and reset causes Faruque Ansari
2026-09-24 12:14     ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-24  7:08   ` [PATCH v15 5/6] power: reset: Introduce PSCR Recording Framework for Non-Volatile Storage Faruque Ansari
2026-10-02  9:06     ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-10-05 12:26       ` Faruque Ansari [this message]
2026-09-24  7:08   ` [PATCH v15 6/6] Documentation: Add sysfs documentation for PSCRR Faruque Ansari
2026-09-25 17:34 ` [PATCH v14 0/6] power: reset: Introduce the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) framework Bradley Morgan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c5b6538b-98f0-4feb-81bf-531b9d350654@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=faruque.ansari@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=avaneesh.dwivedi@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=francesco@valla.it \
    --cc=groeck@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sre@kernel.org \
    --cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®