From: Faruque Ansari <faruque.ansari@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
avaneesh.dwivedi@oss.qualcomm.com,
Umang Chheda <umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Francesco Valla <francesco@valla.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 5/6] power: reset: Introduce PSCR Recording Framework for Non-Volatile Storage
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 17:56:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5b6538b-98f0-4feb-81bf-531b9d350654@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ar90GoaxTV8pjonY@mai.linaro.org>
Hi Daniel Lezcano,
On 02-Oct-26 2:36 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:38:46PM +0530, Faruque Ansari wrote:
>> Introduce the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) framework: a
>> generic mechanism to record why the last power state change (shutdown or
>> reboot) happened - under-voltage, thermal, watchdog, software-triggered,
>> etc. - so a postmortem reason survives a reboot or an abrupt power loss.
>>
>> PSCRR is built around providers. A provider is either a hardware reason
>> source (a PMIC, SoC reset controller or watchdog exposing a reset cause)
>> or a recorder that persists the reason across a power cycle (an NVMEM or
>> RTC scratch cell). Each provider gets a directory under
>> /sys/kernel/pscrr/providerN/ exposing its name, backing device, the set
>> of observed reasons (as tokens), its capabilities, the reasons it
>> supports and - for recorders - a record policy. The reason set is
>> deliberately not collapsed to a single winning cause, since resets are
>> often multi-causal.
>>
>> Reasons are the numeric enum psc_reason values from reboot.h, shared with
>> the POWER_ON_REASON_* vocabulary, so they store compactly in small
>> battery-backed cells. The current reason (get/set_psc_reason(), set by
>> the thermal/regulator/hw_protection paths) is written to every recorder
>> from the reboot notifier.
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +menuconfig PSCRR
>> + bool "Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) Framework"
>> + depends on POWER_RESET
>> + help
>> + Enables the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) framework.
>> +
>> + PSCRR records why the system last shut down or rebooted into
>> + non-volatile storage, so the reason survives the reset and can be
>> + read by the bootloader or early user space on the next boot. Reasons
>> + come from software (thermal or regulator hardware-protection events,
>> + a watchdog pretimeout, a kernel panic, a controlled reboot) or from
>> + hardware reset-cause registers (PMIC, SoC reset controller, watchdog).
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +static int pscrr_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> + unsigned long action, void *unused)
>> +{
>> + guard(mutex)(&pscrr_lock);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * A reboot, halt or power-off that reaches here with no more specific
>> + * reason is software-initiated by definition. Record it as such rather
>> + * than leaving it unattributed; a real cause set earlier (thermal,
>> + * under-voltage, ...) is already latched and left untouched.
>> + */
>> + if (get_psc_reason() == PSCR_UNKNOWN)
>> + set_psc_reason(PSCR_SOFTWARE);
>> +
>> + pscrr_record_current();
>> +
>> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct notifier_block pscrr_reboot_nb = {
>> + .notifier_call = pscrr_reboot_notifier,
>> +};
>
> I'm worried about the mechanism. The call to set_psc_reason() sets a
> global variable and pscrr_record_current() write its value to the
> NVMEM backend.
>
> That is done from the reboot notifier.
>
> Is this notifier called in all cases, eg. watchdog reset or emergency
> reboot ? It sounds possible the reason is set but then the notifier is
> not called thus not written in the non-volatile medium, no ?
Ack.
Thanks for your review.
You're right. The current core series reliably records only
orderly reboot/shutdown paths via the reboot notifier chain;
emergency_restart() bypasses it, so the reason may be set but not
recorded.
Panic-driven emergency reboots (e.g. sysrq-c and watchdog
pretimeout panic) are addressed by my follow-up v3 series [1],
which records the reset cause via panic_notifier_list before
panic() reaches emergency_restart().
For true hardware resets (e.g. watchdog bite, brownout, or
external reset), no Linux code executes, so software recording is
not possible. Those cases are expected to be handled by PMIC/SoC
reset-cause providers on the subsequent boot. The PMIC
reset-cause provider is planned to be posted as a separate series
once NVMEM provider support is accepted.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260804-pscrr-reboot-reason-v3-0-e706dbfc7465@oss.qualcomm.com/
Thanks,
Faruque Ansari
>
> [ ... ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 17:44 [PATCH v14 0/6] power: reset: Introduce the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) framework Faruque Ansari
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 1/6] power: Extend power_on_reason.h for upcoming PSCRR framework Faruque Ansari
2026-09-22 6:02 ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 2/6] reboot: hw_protection_trigger: use standardized numeric shutdown/reboot reasons instead of strings Faruque Ansari
2026-10-02 7:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-10-05 12:27 ` Faruque Ansari
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 3/6] reboot: add parsable tokens for power state change reasons Faruque Ansari
2026-09-22 7:37 ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-23 11:05 ` Faruque Ansari
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 4/6] reboot: extend psc_reason with power-on and reset causes Faruque Ansari
2026-09-22 7:45 ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-23 11:05 ` Faruque Ansari
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 5/6] power: reset: Introduce PSCR Recording Framework for Non-Volatile Storage Faruque Ansari
2026-09-22 9:03 ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-23 11:06 ` Faruque Ansari
2026-09-21 17:44 ` [PATCH v14 6/6] Documentation: Add sysfs documentation for PSCRR Faruque Ansari
2026-09-22 9:12 ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-22 6:33 ` [PATCH v14 0/6] power: reset: Introduce the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) framework Bradley Morgan
2026-09-22 6:44 ` Faruque Ansari
2026-09-24 7:08 ` [PATCH v15 " Faruque Ansari
2026-09-24 7:08 ` [PATCH v15 1/6] power: Extend power_on_reason.h for upcoming PSCRR framework Faruque Ansari
2026-10-01 20:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-10-02 4:22 ` Oleksij Rempel
2026-10-02 7:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-09-24 7:08 ` [PATCH v15 2/6] reboot: hw_protection_trigger: use standardized numeric shutdown/reboot reasons instead of strings Faruque Ansari
2026-09-24 7:08 ` [PATCH v15 3/6] reboot: add parsable tokens for power state change reasons Faruque Ansari
2026-10-02 7:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-09-24 7:08 ` [PATCH v15 4/6] reboot: extend psc_reason with power-on and reset causes Faruque Ansari
2026-09-24 12:14 ` Matti Vaittinen
2026-09-24 7:08 ` [PATCH v15 5/6] power: reset: Introduce PSCR Recording Framework for Non-Volatile Storage Faruque Ansari
2026-10-02 9:06 ` Daniel Lezcano
2026-10-05 12:26 ` Faruque Ansari [this message]
2026-09-24 7:08 ` [PATCH v15 6/6] Documentation: Add sysfs documentation for PSCRR Faruque Ansari
2026-09-25 17:34 ` [PATCH v14 0/6] power: reset: Introduce the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR) framework Bradley Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c5b6538b-98f0-4feb-81bf-531b9d350654@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=faruque.ansari@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=avaneesh.dwivedi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=francesco@valla.it \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=umang.chheda@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®