Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: dwc2: document the port when usb-role-switch is used

[Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>]

On 10/29/21 12:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 7:05 AM Fabrice Gasnier
> <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/26/21 10:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 06:53:46PM +0200, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
>>>> Document the "port" property, which is used with "usb-role-switch"
>>>> to describe the bus connector.
>>>> Definition is inspired from mediatek,mtu3.yaml.
>>>>
>>>> This fixes some errors seen when running "make dtbs_check":
>>>> ... 'port' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>>>         From schema: ... Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml | 10 ++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml
>>>> index 10c7d9b..7d1aa53 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.yaml
>>>> @@ -130,6 +130,16 @@ properties:
>>>>      description: If present indicates that we need to reset the PHY when we
>>>>        detect a wakeup. This is due to a hardware errata.
>>>>
>>>> +  port:
>>>> +    description:
>>>> +      Any connector to the data bus of this controller should be modelled
>>>> +      using the OF graph bindings specified, if the "usb-role-switch"
>>>> +      property is used. See graph.txt
>>>
>>> Drop 'See graph.txt'
>>>
>>>> +    $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
>>>> +
>>>> +dependencies:
>>>> +  port: [ 'usb-role-switch' ]
>>>
>>> usb-role-switch without port is valid or both must be present. In case
>>> of the latter, you need to add:
> 
> If I wasn't clear, that was a question. Is usb-role-switch without
> port is valid?

Hi Rob,

Ah ok... I didn't get it was a question.
So, usb-role-switch without port is valid.

> 
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Thanks for your review.
>> I agree with your statement. But I miss something in this proposal:
>>
>>>
>>> usb-role-switch: [ port ]
>>
>> I tried this without success, when running dt_binding_check.
>>
>> For testing, I added locally in the example successively:
>>
>> 1 - usb-role-switch (alone)
>> -----
>> +        usb-role-switch;
>> "dwc2.example.dt.yaml: usb@101c0000: 'port' is a dependency of
>> 'usb-role-switch'
>>
>> 2 - port without usb-role-switch
>> -----
>> +        //usb-role-switch;
>> +
>> +        port {
>> +          usb_role_sw: endpoint {
>> +            remote-endpoint = <&hs_ep>;
>> +          };
>> +        };
>> dt_binding_check is happy here. But it shouldn't, right ?
> 
> You had this?:
> 
> dependencies:
>   usb-role-switch: [ port ]
>   port: [ usb-role-switch ]

no, above test was only with "usb-role-switch: [ port ]"

> 
> 
> If both properties have to be present together, then you need the above.

This isn't the case. The only constraints here is, if port is used, then
usb-role-switch must be set.

dependencies:
  port: [ usb-role-switch ]

V2 is under review, with the above.

BR,
Fabrice
> 
>>
>> 3 - both (port + usb-role-switch)
>> -----
>> dt_binding_check is ok.