mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@qperret.net>,
	"# v4 . 16+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Disable sched_asym_cpucapacity on domain destruction
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 11:22:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5fec41b-87f1-be4e-475f-69c7394f5467@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b058430-1951-3d58-ebf4-8195a28ff233@arm.com>

On 14/10/2019 18:03, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 14/10/2019 14:52, Quentin Perret wrote:
>> Right, but that's not possible by definition -- static keys aren't
>> variables. The static keys for asym CPUs and for EAS are just to
>> optimize the case when they're disabled, but when they _are_ enabled,
>> you have no choice but do another per-rd check.
>>
> 
> Bleh, right, realized my nonsense after sending the email.
> 
>> And to clarify what I tried to say before, it might be possible to
>> 'count' the number of RDs that have SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY set using
>> static_branch_inc()/dec(), like we do for the SMT static key. I remember
>> trying to do something like that for EAS, but that was easier said than
>> done ... :)
>>
> 
> Gotcha, the reason I didn't go with this is that I wanted to maintain
> the relationship between the key and the flag (you either have both or none).
> It feels icky to have the key set and to have a NULL sd_asym_cpucapacity
> pointer.
> 
> An alternative might be to have a separate counter for asymmetric rd's,
> always disable the key on domain destruction and use that counter to figure
> out if we need to restore it. If we don't care about having a NULL SD
> pointer while the key is set, we could use the included counter as you're
> suggesting.

I still don't understand the benefit of the counter approach here.
sched_smt_present counts the number of cores with SMT. So in case you
have 2 SMT cores with 2 HW threads and you CPU hp out one CPU, you still
have sched_smt_present, although 1 CPU doesn't have a SMT thread sibling
anymore.

Valentin's patch makes sure that sched_asym_cpucapacity is correctly set
when the sd hierarchy is rebuild due to CPU hp. Including the unlikely
scenario that an asymmetric CPU capacity system (based on DT's
capacity-dmips-mhz values) turns normal SMT because of the max frequency
values of the CPUs involved.

Systems with a mix of asymmetric and symmetric CPU capacity rd's have to
live with the fact that wake_cap and misfit handling is enabled for
them. This should be the case already today.

There should be no SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag on the sd's of the CPUs of
the symmetric CPU capacity rd's. I.e. update_top_cache_domain() should
set sd_asym_cpucapacity=NULL for those CPUs.

So as a rule we could say even if a static key enables a code path, a
derefenced sd still has to be checked against NULL.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-15  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-14 11:47 Valentin Schneider
2019-10-14 11:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-14 12:16 ` Quentin Perret
2019-10-14 13:29   ` Vincent Guittot
2019-10-14 13:46     ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-14 13:52       ` Quentin Perret
2019-10-14 16:03         ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-15  9:22           ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2019-10-15  9:47             ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-15 11:07             ` Quentin Perret
2019-10-15 12:56               ` Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c5fec41b-87f1-be4e-475f-69c7394f5467@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=qperret@qperret.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome