From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757951AbYLMOqU (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752179AbYLMOqH (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:07 -0500 Received: from mail-qy0-f11.google.com ([209.85.221.11]:51427 "EHLO mail-qy0-f11.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752022AbYLMOqG (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:06 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=T4KjCW1gDyQcMe8xYuyhwJjTb7sgZXbJU/fWqO0op7YPERZlhufR0KTA9HSyHbigAx xxyPieL7ICFRxNazusMXz5DURcxlpVwgFlQJfcQwLvxpVWQJeB9xnW2RMcdaDpmtm4Hx kjgvGx9/HrMDPMJGiRTCeiVG9uYFmOiLpda3c= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:46:03 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Weisbecker?=" To: "Cyrill Gorcunov" Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: entry_64 - introduce FTRACE_ frame macro Cc: "Steven Rostedt" , "Steven Rostedt" , "Ingo Molnar" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Thomas Gleixner" , LKML , "Alexander van Heukelum" In-Reply-To: <20081213082054.GA7559@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081212184136.GB14192@localhost> <1229113167.32623.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081212204724.GA26194@localhost> <20081212205729.GA28554@localhost> <20081212213538.GA731@localhost> <20081213082054.GA7559@localhost> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2008/12/13 Cyrill Gorcunov : > [Steven Rostedt - Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 04:56:47PM -0500] > ... > | > Steve, here is how it could look like: > | > (I liked first proposal more :) > | > | I see the confusion. In ftrace.h the function graph tracer config is not > | inside CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER, even though it is dependent on it (or > | was). OK, just do your first proposal then. > | > | -- Steve > | > > ok, I sent it yesterday as > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/12/301 > [PATCH] x86: entry_64 - introduce FTRACE_ frame macro v2 > > Ingo, will you pick it up? > > - Cyrill - > Hi, Looks good and clarify the asm bits. I wonder if the function_graph_tracer should continue to necessarily depend on the function tracer. It was more simplier to do so but perhaps that could be avoided with small modifications.