[PATCH] EDAC/amd64: Add support for AMD family 1Ah-based newer models

["Naik, Avadhut" <avadnaik@amd.com>]

On 7/24/2025 08:24, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 07:27:31PM +0000, Avadhut Naik wrote:
>> Add support for family 1Ah-based models 50h-57h, 90h-9Fh, A0h-AFh, and
>> C0h-C7h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h |  2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>> index 07f1e9dc1ca7..06ae6750ca14 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>> @@ -3923,6 +3923,26 @@ static int per_family_init(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
>>  			pvt->ctl_name           = "F1Ah_M40h";
>>  			pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2   = 1;
>>  			break;
>> +		case 0x50 ... 0x57:
>> +			pvt->ctl_name           = "F1Ah_M50h";
>> +			pvt->max_mcs            = 16;
>> +			pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2   = 1;
>> +			break;
>> +		case 0x90 ... 0x9f:
>> +			pvt->ctl_name			= "F1Ah_M90h";
>> +			pvt->max_mcs			= 8;
>> +			pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2	= 1;
>> +			break;
>> +		case 0xa0 ... 0xaf:
>> +			pvt->ctl_name			= "F1Ah_MA0h";
>> +			pvt->max_mcs			= 8;
>> +			pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2	= 1;
>> +			break;
>> +		case 0xc0 ... 0xc7:
>> +			pvt->ctl_name			= "F1Ah_MC0h";
>> +			pvt->max_mcs			= 16;
> 
> These last three groups have extra tabs. Please align them with the
> other lines.
> 

Yes, will do!
>> +			pvt->flags.zn_regs_v2	= 1;
>> +			break;
>>  		}
>>  		break;
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
>> index 17228d07de4c..d70b8a8d0b09 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
>>  /* Hardware limit on ChipSelect rows per MC and processors per system */
>>  #define NUM_CHIPSELECTS			8
>>  #define DRAM_RANGES			8
>> -#define NUM_CONTROLLERS			12
>> +#define NUM_CONTROLLERS			16
> 
> The "legacy sysfs interface" needs an update too. I don't know if folks
> still actively use it, but it hasn't been totally removed yet.
> 
> See this commit as an example:
> 25836ce1df82 ("EDAC/mc_sysfs: Increase legacy channel support to 12")
> 

Okay. Will update the sysfs interface too!

> Thanks,
> Yazen

-- 
Thanks,
Avadhut Naik