From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next 2/6] cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in update_parent_effective_cpumask()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 21:45:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c65208d9-aba6-4e9a-affa-4f7cd8794a0c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261022031643.1351877-3-longman@redhat.com>
Hi Longman,
在 2026/10/22 11:16, Waiman Long 写道:
> Since the introduction of cpuset.cpus.exclusive in commit
> e2ffe502ba45 ("cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset.cpus.exclusive for v2"), a
> compute_effective_exclusive_cpumask() helper which is later renamed to
> compute_excpus() is added to compute the effective xcpus of a partition
> root. However update_parent_effective_cpumask() is not updated in all
> proper places to use the new helper to check if a given cpuset should
> remain a valid partition root. This can cause a cpuset to incorrectly
> remain a valid partition root even if no effective xcpus is left.
>
> Fix that problem by using compute_excpus() to compute the effective xcpus
> into delmask in all cases except partcmd_disable and partcmd_invalidate
> and use it for tasks_nocpu_error() check as well as checking its
> emptiness. This enables us to catch invalid partition root more
> accurately in update_parent_effective_cpumask().
>
I re-tested the repro from the link below on top of this series
(applied on cgroup/for-7.4-fixes), and it still fails:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261010075947.333549-3-guopeng.zhang@linux.dev/
cd /sys/fs/cgroup
echo +cpuset > cgroup.subtree_control
mkdir A
echo 0-7 > A/cpuset.cpus
echo 0-7 > A/cpuset.cpus.exclusive
echo root > A/cpuset.cpus.partition
cat A/cpuset.cpus.partition
echo 1 > A/cpuset.cpus.exclusive
cat A/cpuset.cpus.partition
The last command still shows "root invalid (Parent unable to distribute
cpu downstream)".
In this case compute_excpus() returns the stale user mask unchanged.
user_xcpus() is gone from update_parent_effective_cpumask(), but the
dependency just moved one level down: the new code calls
compute_excpus(cs, tmp->delmask), and its first line is
cpumask_and(excpus, user_xcpus(cs), parent->effective_xcpus)
Here user_xcpus(cs) is cs->exclusive_cpus, which still holds the old
0-7 when compute_excpus() runs: update_exclusive_cpumask() publishes
cs->exclusive_cpus only after partition_cpus_change(). Nothing corrects
it either - the sibling trim is skipped as exclusive_cpus is non-empty,
and for a direct child of the root cpuset the intersection with
parent->effective_xcpus is a no-op. So the stale 0-7 mask still reaches
tasks_nocpu_error() and PERR_NOCPUS is set again. Please point it out
if I got the analysis wrong.
I have rebased my fix on top of this series and the partition recovers
correctly with it applied. Should the fix be folded into this patch,
or is there a better way to fix it? Happy to hear your thoughts.
Also, is the test case below worth adding here as well? Note that it
fails until the fix is in:
# An invalid local partition that took all the CPUs from its
# populated parent should recover after its cpuset.cpus.exclusive
# list is changed to a valid one.
"C0-7:X0-7:P1 . . . X1 . . . 0 A1:1|XA1:1 A1:P1 ."
Thanks,
Guopeng
> Some test case are added to test_cpuset_prs.sh for invalidating a
> partition root due to its effective xcpus becoming empty as well as
> making sure that an invalid partition can only be revived when exclusive
> CPUs are available agin.
>
> Fixes: e2ffe502ba45 ("cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset.cpus.exclusive for v2")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 36 +++++++++----------
> .../selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 6 ++++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 7ead8c3b7974..db6e4663f4be 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1798,7 +1798,6 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> int deleting; /* Deleting cpus from parent's effective_cpus */
> int old_prs, new_prs;
> int part_error = PERR_NONE; /* Partition error? */
> - struct cpumask *xcpus = user_xcpus(cs);
> int parent_prs = parent->partition_root_state;
> bool nocpu;
>
> @@ -1841,30 +1840,29 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> if (!newmask && xcpus_empty(cs))
> return PERR_CPUSEMPTY;
>
> - nocpu = tasks_nocpu_error(parent, cs, xcpus);
> + /*
> + * Except for partcmd_disable, use delmask to compute the current
> + * effective xcpus value and use it for tasks_nocpu_error check.
> + */
> + if (cmd != partcmd_disable) {
> + compute_excpus(cs, tmp->delmask);
> + nocpu = tasks_nocpu_error(parent, cs, tmp->delmask);
> + }
>
> if ((cmd == partcmd_enable) || (cmd == partcmd_enablei)) {
> - /*
> - * Need to call compute_excpus() in case
> - * exclusive_cpus not set. Sibling conflict should only happen
> - * if exclusive_cpus isn't set.
> - */
> - xcpus = tmp->delmask;
> - if (compute_excpus(cs, xcpus))
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_empty(cs->exclusive_cpus));
> new_prs = (cmd == partcmd_enable) ? PRS_ROOT : PRS_ISOLATED;
>
> /*
> * Enabling partition root is not allowed if its
> * effective_xcpus is empty.
> */
> - if (cpumask_empty(xcpus))
> + if (cpumask_empty(tmp->delmask))
> return PERR_INVCPUS;
>
> - if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(new_prs, parent_prs, xcpus, NULL))
> + if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(new_prs, parent_prs, tmp->delmask, NULL))
> return PERR_HKEEPING;
>
> - if (tasks_nocpu_error(parent, cs, xcpus))
> + if (nocpu)
> return PERR_NOCPUS;
>
> /*
> @@ -1876,9 +1874,8 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> *
> * Warn if it is not the case.
> */
> - cpumask_and(tmp->new_cpus, xcpus, cpu_active_mask);
> + cpumask_and(tmp->new_cpus, tmp->delmask, cpu_active_mask);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_subset(tmp->new_cpus, parent->effective_cpus));
> -
> deleting = true;
> } else if (cmd == partcmd_disable) {
> /*
> @@ -1973,7 +1970,7 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> * A partition error happens when parent has tasks and all
> * its effective CPUs will have to be distributed out.
> */
> - if (nocpu) {
> + if (nocpu || cpumask_empty(tmp->delmask)) {
> part_error = PERR_NOCPUS;
> if (is_partition_valid(cs))
> adding = cpumask_and(tmp->addmask,
> @@ -1986,8 +1983,7 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> cpumask_copy(tmp->addmask, cs->effective_xcpus);
> adding = true;
> }
> - } else if (is_partition_invalid(cs) && !cpumask_empty(xcpus) &&
> - cpumask_subset(xcpus, parent->effective_xcpus)) {
> + } else if (is_partition_invalid(cs)) {
> struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> struct cpuset *child;
> bool exclusive = true;
> @@ -1998,7 +1994,7 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> * check.
> */
> if (prstate_housekeeping_conflict(cs->partition_root_state,
> - parent_prs, xcpus, NULL)) {
> + parent_prs, tmp->delmask, NULL)) {
> part_error = PERR_HKEEPING;
> goto write_error;
> }
> @@ -2014,7 +2010,7 @@ static int update_parent_effective_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, int cmd,
> rcu_read_unlock();
> if (exclusive)
> deleting = cpumask_and(tmp->delmask,
> - xcpus, parent->effective_cpus);
> + tmp->delmask, parent->effective_cpus);
> else
> part_error = PERR_NOTEXCL;
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> index d04aad697b96..47791591002f 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> @@ -359,6 +359,8 @@ TEST_MATRIX=(
> A1:P0|A2:P1|A3:P2|B1:P1 2-4|3"
> " C1-6:P1 C3-6:P1 C5-6:P1 . . P2 . . 0 A1:1-2|A2:3-6|A3:5-6 \
> A1:P1|A2:P2|A3:P-1 3-6"
> + " C1-6:P2 C3-6:P2 C3-4:P2 . . C5-6 . . 0 A1:1-4|A2:5-6|A3:5-6 \
> + A1:P2|A2:P2|A3:P-2 1-6"
> " C1-4:X2-4 C2-4:X3-4:P1 C3-4:X4:P2 \
> . . X5 . . 0 A1:1-4|A2:2-4|A3:3-4 \
> A1:P0|A2:P-1|A3:P-2 ."
> @@ -427,6 +429,10 @@ TEST_MATRIX=(
> # cpuset.cpus is allowed, but those extra CPUs are ignored.
> " C2-3:P1 C3:P1 . . . C2-4 . . 0 A1:|A2:2-3 A1:P1|A2:P1"
>
> + # A child cannot recover until its exclusive CPUs are available again.
> + " CX1-4:P1 CX3-4:P1 . . X1-2 . . . 0 A1:1-2|A2:1-2|XA2: A1:P1|A2:P-1"
> + " CX1-4:P1 CX3-4:P1 . . X1-2:X1-4 . . . 0 A1:1-2|A2:3-4|XA2:3-4 A1:P1|A2:P1"
> +
> # Taking away all CPUs from parent or itself if there are tasks
> # will make the partition invalid.
> " C2-3:P1 C3:P1 . . T C2-3 . . 0 A1:2-3|A2:2-3 A1:P1|A2:P-1"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-22 3:16 [PATCH-next 0/6] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes Waiman Long
2026-10-22 3:16 ` [PATCH-next 1/6] cgroup/cpuset: Find furthest isolated ancestor for invalidated isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-10-22 13:25 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-22 16:19 ` Waiman Long
2026-10-22 3:16 ` [PATCH-next 2/6] cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in update_parent_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-22 13:45 ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-10-22 14:47 ` Waiman Long
2026-10-22 15:00 ` Waiman Long
2026-10-22 3:16 ` [PATCH-next 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-22 3:16 ` [PATCH-next 4/6] cgroup/cpuset: Minor fixes to prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-22 14:15 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-22 14:35 ` Waiman Long
2026-10-22 3:16 ` [PATCH-next 5/6] selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before running test matrix Waiman Long
2026-10-22 14:09 ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-22 3:16 ` [PATCH-next 6/6] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent recursive call of remote_cpus_update() via update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-22 14:23 ` Guopeng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c65208d9-aba6-4e9a-affa-4f7cd8794a0c@linux.dev \
--to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®