From: "Nirujogi, Pratap" <pnirujog@amd.com>
To: Seifelden Abdelmonem <saif.elden.hatim@gmail.com>,
Nirujogi Pratap <pratap.nirujogi@amd.com>
Cc: Bin Du <bin.du@amd.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>,
Benjamin Chan <benjamin.chan@amd.com>, King Li <King.Li@amd.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: amd: isp4: hold buf_list_lock while sending buffers at stream start
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 14:05:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c653b237-c67f-4332-8a3f-364773366dfe@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103150312.52812-1-saif.elden.hatim@gmail.com>
Hi Seifelden,
On 11/3/2026 10:02 AM, Seifelden Abdelmonem wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> Hello Pratap,
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2026, Nirujogi, Pratap wrote:
>> I’m curious about the sequence you are using to reproduce this issue.
>> Would you mind sharing the details of the sequence and steps involved?
>
> Thanks for the review. Nothing special on the userspace side, just a
> plain capture; the exact command from that run was:
>
> timeout 8s v4l2-ctl -d /dev/video0 \
> --set-fmt-video=width=1920,height=1080,pixelformat=NV12 \
> --stream-mmap=4 --stream-count=30 --stream-to=out.nv12 \
> --stream-poll
>
> The oops happened inside VIDIOC_STREAMON, before the first frame
> reached v4l2-ctl.
>
> What made it hit was an out-of-tree change on my side: the sensor was
> started from inside isp4sd_ioc_send_img_buf(), right after
> START_STREAM was queued with the fourth buffer, and that path had about
> a second of debug sleeps in it. By the time the call returned, the
> firmware had already completed that buffer and
> isp4vid_handle_frame_done() had removed it from buf_list, so the walk
> followed the poisoned next pointer. With the stock driver the window
> is tiny, which fits it never showing up in your tests.
>
> To make it reproducible without the debug sleeps, I put an msleep(500)
> after each isp4sd_ioc_send_img_buf() call in the start_streaming loop:
>
> list_for_each_entry(isp4vid_buf, &isp_vdev->buf_list, list) {
> isp4sd_ioc_send_img_buf(isp_vdev->isp_sdev,
> &isp4vid_buf->img_buf);
> msleep(500);
> }
>
> and ran the same command again (my out-of-tree sensor start was still
> there, the debug sleeps were not):
>
> - unpatched loop: the same oops (GPF in
> isp4if_alloc_buffer_node+0x37, RBX/RSI dead0000000000b8), 500 ms
> after the call that queued START_STREAM;
> - with this patch: the capture completes (30 frames), no oops.
>
> I'd expect the same msleep() to reproduce it on the HP ZBook.
>
Thanks for the detailed explanation, that clarifies why the issue
hasn't shown up with the stock driver in our testing.
I can reproduce the same oops on the HP ZBook with msleep(500) added
after each isp4sd_ioc_send_img_buf() call in the start_streaming loop,
and with this patch applied the capture completes without issues.
Tested-by: Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@amd.com>
Thanks,
Pratap
> Regards,
>
> Seifelden
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 18:24 [PATCH 0/2] media: amd: isp4: two fixes found on the ROG Flow Z13 Seifelden Abdelmonem
2026-10-26 18:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] media: amd: isp4: hold buf_list_lock while sending buffers at stream start Seifelden Abdelmonem
2026-10-27 8:51 ` Bin Du
2026-11-02 19:16 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2026-11-03 15:02 ` Seifelden Abdelmonem
2026-11-03 19:05 ` Nirujogi, Pratap [this message]
2026-10-26 18:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] media: amd: isp4: return capture buffers with V4L2_FIELD_NONE Seifelden Abdelmonem
2026-10-27 8:51 ` Bin Du
2026-11-02 19:17 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c653b237-c67f-4332-8a3f-364773366dfe@amd.com \
--to=pnirujog@amd.com \
--cc=King.Li@amd.com \
--cc=benjamin.chan@amd.com \
--cc=bin.du@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=pratap.nirujogi@amd.com \
--cc=saif.elden.hatim@gmail.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sultan@kerneltoast.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®