From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net (009.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E82A116419; Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727911557; cv=none; b=r+Hx5S3NT07ZuwUedaplygrZaJb3M+PXNxJlfaQe7wmhS7CZtYWHtZ1yw8MrTZT0owBUAJrFV0M6ZDq+r3pt0Qy6uooJFaUh3MlcxEDLJEKn9Mf6MKlKLEcjr2Frkiu1k7AOn1OrMMEFsOhGOQP37XDKG085D/PqiCOE9XNIStg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727911557; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Spgh0nrvjjAlwuzc8l05vKO2JLa4EIPhGSkSkf66ZEg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=swcqy64iQ1eV+shlcsnsouHmdpji6NQOetYs/mAaIVUFPE4GUmuAuEJunxSfhDNR26wdmCC7zUeaWIapfwJHLJN1A8OtjiDMuiqVn2ynpUO0lrIrdFJNZEQ/BzNxkQwEFqVDMBL+3TI775gZw4ree0ogInleXdwXtf0H0ofQhMI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=Xk/32Lhr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="Xk/32Lhr" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XJrXM2YNvzlgMWH; Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:25:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1727911553; x=1730503554; bh=Spgh0nrvjjAlwuzc8l05vKO2 JLa4EIPhGSkSkf66ZEg=; b=Xk/32LhrMafzx4wEd6bL9Nek2GCkhJ82TDGIkB6s asPXGSac2WbcB2sM7S6veNavVk7k0hktsgryCLVZYnknZkFb1gPmzjRJFnFd5EGc aN1NUTqzdXhCT3ZXvHlbWT3z1/r900+rxNg5CPgKQ/JD4fnFn/76YYByrOGPSKI9 ewoFABSVsEEs7DtVk7+aXZMBo7YRr110tapnc7w07JQtITXv58aguh/YFaFc7EUI ibTkZUwE/wnFUpMWxFMDs0D1s/zRNC4rww2XJx9Ia1mJ/MWMDGWyXOqAnO2nJV72 Dfl+Wbw44fbuHV9u9c4RI52xhZVY/mV79TxUcdQAprOIWw== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (009.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id o5LB0KC6MTNg; Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.50.14] (c-73-231-117-72.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.117.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4XJrXG5WdHzlgMWG; Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:25:46 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: Use pre-calculated offsets in ufshcd_init_lrb To: Avri Altman , "Martin K . Petersen" Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Alim Akhtar , Daejun Park References: <20240910044543.3812642-1-avri.altman@wdc.com> <5c15b6c8-b47b-40fc-ba05-e71ef6681ad2@acm.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/1/24 12:19 AM, Avri Altman wrote: > Bart - How do you want to proceed with this fix? As one can see here [1], if this patch is applied on top of the android-mainline kernel branch (close to v6.12-rc1) then all presubmit tests pass. This includes booting the kernel on a Pixel 6 device that has an Exynos UFS host controller. So I'm fine with this patch. [1] https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/3291741 Thanks, Bart.