From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@google.com>
Cc: rohkumar@qti.qualcomm.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
bgoswami@codeaurora.org, vinod.koul@linaro.org,
plai@codeaurora.org, tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
Ajit Pandey <ajitp@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
Matthias Reichl <hias@horus.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, asishb@codeaurora.org,
Rohit kumar <rohitkr@codeaurora.org>,
Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>,
Dylan Reid <dgreid@google.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: Fix null pointer dereference in soc_find_component
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:11:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6721670-cf89-5d21-953d-c1fa10d87367@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOReqxjLcdN6rT9w3_6MJaqE-hpiCsZ+3Luic+e793GwPde+Qg@mail.gmail.com>
> The issue was that we were seeing a memory corruption bug on an AMD
> chromebooks with that function already (not observed on Intel). I was
> testing some SOF integrations and was seeing this in the kernel logs.
> I had Dylan verify my logic before I sent the patch because it took so
> long to identify the bug and it was traced to the patch that introduce
> soc_init_platform.
>
> [ 10.922112] cz-da7219-max98357a AMD7219:00: ASoC: CPU DAI
> designware-i2s.1.auto not registered
> [ 10.922122] cz-da7219-max98357a AMD7219:00:
> devm_snd_soc_register_card(acpd7219m98357) failed: -517
> [ 11.001411] cz-da7219-max98357a AMD7219:00: ASoC: Both platform
> name/of_node are set for amd-max98357-play
> [ 11.001423] cz-da7219-max98357a AMD7219:00: ASoC: failed to init
> link amd-max98357-play
> [ 11.001431] cz-da7219-max98357a AMD7219:00:
> devm_snd_soc_register_card(acpd7219m98357) failed: -22
> [ 11.001577] cz-da7219-max98357a: probe of AMD7219:00 failed with error -22
>
> of_node was never getting set but the pointer was becoming populated
> (outside of the probe call) which traced to soc_init_platform function
> which was not reallocating memory on a EPROBE_DEFER even though it was
> getting freed by devm. I am not very familiar with devm but my local
> maintainers say that it should be freeing the memory even on a
> PROBE_DEFER.
> The patch should mirror the memory behaviour in
> snd_soc_init_multicodec which also reallocates its memory on every
> probe. I'm not sure how the patch is causing you to defer, is your
> component list corrupt?
>
> Sorry for the duplicate spam, forgot to send via plain text mode,
> re-sending for the mailing list so it gets accepted.
There is no defer issue with the intel stuff, but we call this routine
multiple times
snd_soc_register_card
--soc_init_dai_link
----snd_soc_init_platform
-- soc_soc_bind_card
----snd_soc_instantiate_card
------ soc_check_tplg_fes
-------- snd_soc_init_platform << ALLOC1
--------soc_init_dai_link
----------snd_soc_init_platform << ALLOC2
Initially dai_link->legacy_platform is 0, so gets set after the first
first devm_kzalloc (ALLOC1) and after that we always allocate new memory
(ALLOC2). The end result is that whatever we set in soc_check_tplg_fes
is lost with the new/unnecessary alloc.
I would guess your solution is also a work-around, if devm_ effectively
freed the memory then the pointer would become NULL. Or may that's the
issue is that no one actually resets it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-22 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-11 8:14 Rohit kumar
2019-01-11 15:44 ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-11 21:49 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-12 6:07 ` Rohit kumar
2019-01-14 15:40 ` Liam Girdwood
2019-01-15 0:06 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-15 3:08 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-15 19:35 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-15 21:07 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-15 21:11 ` Matthias Reichl
2019-01-15 21:16 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-15 21:41 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-15 21:48 ` Matthias Reichl
2019-01-18 23:02 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
[not found] ` <CAOReqxjhZAzOpr-bGcV6uxPsOEid--Ym2Y0YZMHkybgZSePvtQ@mail.gmail.com>
2019-01-19 1:15 ` Curtis Malainey
2019-01-21 18:30 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-22 20:11 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2019-01-23 1:36 ` Curtis Malainey
2019-01-23 2:01 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-24 18:44 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-24 19:07 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-24 19:26 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-25 1:32 ` Curtis Malainey
2019-01-21 19:17 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-14 23:26 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c6721670-cf89-5d21-953d-c1fa10d87367@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ajitp@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=asishb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bgoswami@codeaurora.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cujomalainey@chromium.org \
--cc=cujomalainey@google.com \
--cc=dgreid@google.com \
--cc=hias@horus.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plai@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rohitkr@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rohkumar@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome