From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1412C04A6B for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 15:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ECC2053B for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 15:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728475AbfEFPAC (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 11:00:02 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:47362 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728506AbfEFOmi (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 10:42:38 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 May 2019 07:42:37 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,438,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="137398978" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 May 2019 07:42:37 -0700 Received: from slaugust-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (unknown [10.254.21.102]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407C458010A; Mon, 6 May 2019 07:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/7] soundwire: add Slave sysfs support To: Greg KH Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com, vkoul@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, jank@cadence.com, joe@perches.com, Sanyog Kale References: <20190504010030.29233-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20190504010030.29233-3-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <20190504065444.GC9770@kroah.com> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 09:42:35 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190504065444.GC9770@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> +static struct attribute_group sdw_slave_dev_attr_group = { >> + .attrs = slave_dev_attrs, >> +}; >> + >> +const struct attribute_group *sdw_slave_dev_attr_groups[] = { >> + &sdw_slave_dev_attr_group, >> + NULL >> +}; > > ATTRIBUTE_GROUP()? yes. > > >> + >> +int sdw_sysfs_slave_init(struct sdw_slave *slave) >> +{ >> + struct sdw_slave_sysfs *sysfs; >> + unsigned int src_dpns, sink_dpns, i, j; >> + int err; >> + >> + if (slave->sysfs) { >> + dev_err(&slave->dev, "SDW Slave sysfs is already initialized\n"); >> + err = -EIO; >> + goto err_ret; >> + } >> + >> + sysfs = kzalloc(sizeof(*sysfs), GFP_KERNEL); > > Same question as patch 1, why a new device? yes it's the same open. In this case, the slave devices are defined at a different level so it's also confusing to create a device to represent the slave properties. The code works but I am not sure the initial directions are correct.