From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Eric Yang <yu.yang_3@nxp.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: No check of the size passed to unmap_single in swiotlb
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:15:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c678cf02-700d-48c0-4160-8ee248a26da5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB3071FBA364C78317F3C3A25D8C200@VI1PR04MB3071.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 22/11/17 03:23, Eric Yang wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@oracle.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 12:27 AM
>> To: Eric Yang <yu.yang_3@nxp.com>; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>; Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>;
>> Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>; David Miller
>> <davem@davemloft.net>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>; Geert
>> Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>; Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>;
>> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>; Daniel Borkmann
>> <daniel@iogearbox.net>
>> Subject: Re: No check of the size passed to unmap_single in swiotlb
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 08:17:14AM +0000, Eric Yang wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>
>> Hi!
>
> Hi Konrad,
>>>
>>> During debug a device only support 32bits DMA(Qualcomm Atheros AP) in our
>> LS1043A 64bits ARM SOC, we found that the invoke of dma_unmap_single -->
>> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single will unmap the passed "size" anyway even when the
>> "size" is incorrect.
>>>
>>> If the size is larger than it should, the extra entries in io_tlb_orig_addr array
>> will be refilled by INVALID_PHYS_ADDR, and it will cause the bounce buffer copy
>> not happen when the one who really used the mis-freed entries doing DMA data
>> transfers, and this will cause further unknow behaviors.
>>>
>>> Here we just fix it temporarily by adding a judge of the "size" in the
>> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single, if it is larger than it deserves, just unmap the right
>> size only. Like the code:
>>
>> Did the DMA debug API (CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG) help in figuring this issue as
>> well?
>>
>
> I have just enabled this config and move off the kernel fix and test, there seems the debug API
> has no output for this size incorrect issue. For I only enable the config and no other operations
> and my kernel is 4.9, do I missed something?
>
> I confirm that the debug API is working, for there are other drivers triggered its warning output
> like:
>
> caam_jr 1710000.jr: DMA-API: device driver tries to free DMA memory it has not allocated
> [device address=0x6800458400000000]
By default, dma-debug will only log the first error it sees - you can
adjust this with the "num_errors" or "all_errors" sysfs controls, and
use the driver filter to hide errors from other drivers if necessary.
Robin.
>>>
>>> [yangyu@titan dash-lts]$ git diff ./lib/swiotlb.c diff --git
>>> a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c index ad1d2962d129..58c97ede9d78
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
>>> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
>>> @@ -591,7 +591,10 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev,
>> phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
>>> */
>>> for (i = index + nslots - 1; i >= index; i--) {
>>> io_tlb_list[i] = ++count;
>>> - io_tlb_orig_addr[i] = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
>>> + if(io_tlb_orig_addr[i] != orig_addr)
>>> + printk("======size wrong, ally down ally down!===\n");
>>> + else
>>> + io_tlb_orig_addr[i] = INVALID_PHYS_ADDR;
>>> }
>>> /*
>>> * Step 2: merge the returned slots with the preceding
>>> slots,
>>>
>>> Although pass a right size of DMA buffer is the responsibility of the drivers, but
>> Is it useful to add some size check code to prevent real damage happen?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-22 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-20 8:17 Eric Yang
2017-11-20 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-11-20 16:50 ` Robin Murphy
2017-11-23 9:08 ` Eric Yang
2017-11-24 13:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-11-28 14:18 ` Robin Murphy
2017-11-30 3:05 ` Eric Yang
2017-11-22 3:23 ` Eric Yang
2017-11-22 13:15 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2017-11-23 7:47 ` Eric Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c678cf02-700d-48c0-4160-8ee248a26da5@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yu.yang_3@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®