From: "saeed bishara" <saeed.bishara@gmail.com>
To: "Paolo Ornati" <ornati@fastwebnet.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: add new code section for kernel code
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 18:27:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c70ff3ad0604060827m6c286965p5a92374347a8a1f0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060406151003.0ef4e637@localhost>
very cooooooooool!!
regarding the readprofile, I think it's recommended to mention that
functions called within spinlocks won't show up.
On 4/6/06, Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:45:47 +0300
> "saeed bishara" <saeed.bishara@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm developing linux kernel for ARM cpu with direct-mapped
> > instruction cache, sometimes I notice that the pefromance of the
> > kernel (for some test) is highly dependent on the code layout, in
> > order to fix that I added new code section, and for each kernel
> > function that highly invokerd I added compiler attribute so it will
> > allocated in that section (exactly as the __init section)
>
> It's already done in 2.6.17-rc1 for x86_64:
>
> Processor type and feature --> Function reordering
>
> arch/x86_64/Kconfig:
>
> config REORDER
> bool "Function reordering"
> default n
> help
> This option enables the toolchain to reorder functions for a more
> optimal TLB usage. If you have pretty much any version of binutils,
> this can increase your kernel build time by roughly one minute.
>
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4bdc3b7f1b730c07f5a6ccca77ee68e044036ffc
>
> --
> Paolo Ornati
> Linux 2.6.16.1 on x86_64
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-06 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-06 12:45 saeed bishara
2006-04-06 13:10 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-04-06 15:27 ` saeed bishara [this message]
2006-04-06 16:47 ` saeed bishara
2006-04-07 11:02 ` saeed bishara
2006-04-07 15:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-07 15:43 ` Russell King
2006-04-09 9:53 ` saeed bishara
2006-04-09 20:30 ` Russell King
2006-04-10 7:11 ` saeed bishara
2006-04-10 9:12 ` Dimitry Andric
2006-04-11 14:49 ` saeed bishara
2006-04-12 5:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c70ff3ad0604060827m6c286965p5a92374347a8a1f0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=saeed.bishara@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ornati@fastwebnet.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®