mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@collabora.com>
To: jason98166@gmail.com, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Guochun Huang <hero.huang@rock-chips.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
	Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] phy: rockchip-samsung-dcphy: Factor the transmitter teardown into a helper
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 15:21:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c746c60f-cc12-4827-bef2-1d1d6f605d0b@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821-dcphy-rx-v1-v4-5-f1797634233d@gmail.com>

Hi Jason,

Thank you for your work!

On 8/21/26 14:02, Jason Yang via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Jason Yang <jason98166@gmail.com>
> 
> The transmitter's power-on path is in samsung_mipi_dphy_tx_power_on(),
> but the power_off callback still does the teardown itself.
> 
> Move the teardown into samsung_mipi_dphy_tx_power_off(), so that
> power-on and power-off are a matching pair. Both callbacks then have a
> type switch whose arms are plain returns. Turn each into an early guard
> for the not yet supported C-PHY and drop the unreachable trailing
> return.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Yang <jason98166@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-dcphy.c | 31 ++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-dcphy.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-dcphy.c
> index f58907dec733..5d9d44a1d6a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-dcphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-dcphy.c
> @@ -1361,37 +1361,34 @@ static int samsung_mipi_dphy_tx_power_on(struct samsung_mipi_dcphy *samsung)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int samsung_mipi_dphy_tx_power_off(struct samsung_mipi_dcphy *samsung)
> +{
> +	samsung_mipi_dphy_tx_lane_disable(samsung);
> +	samsung_mipi_dcphy_pll_disable(samsung);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int samsung_mipi_dcphy_tx_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>  {
>  	struct samsung_mipi_dcphy *samsung = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>  
> -	switch (samsung->type) {
> -	case PHY_TYPE_DPHY:
> -		return samsung_mipi_dphy_tx_power_on(samsung);
> -	default:
> -		/* CPHY part to be implemented later */
> +	/* CPHY part to be implemented later */
> +	if (samsung->type != PHY_TYPE_DPHY)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -	}

What is the value of doing that? Personally I'd leave the switch.

Best regards,
Michael

>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return samsung_mipi_dphy_tx_power_on(samsung);
>  }
>  
>  static int samsung_mipi_dcphy_tx_power_off(struct phy *phy)
>  {
>  	struct samsung_mipi_dcphy *samsung = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>  
> -	switch (samsung->type) {
> -	case PHY_TYPE_DPHY:
> -		samsung_mipi_dphy_tx_lane_disable(samsung);
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		/* CPHY part to be implemented later */
> +	/* CPHY part to be implemented later */
> +	if (samsung->type != PHY_TYPE_DPHY)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -	}
>  
> -	samsung_mipi_dcphy_pll_disable(samsung);
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return samsung_mipi_dphy_tx_power_off(samsung);
>  }
>  
>  static int
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-10 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21 12:02 [PATCH v4 0/7] phy: rockchip-samsung-dcphy: Add the MIPI D-PHY receiver Jason Yang via B4 Relay
2026-08-21 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: phy: Add PHY_TYPE_DSI and PHY_TYPE_CSI definitions Jason Yang via B4 Relay
2026-08-27 11:45   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-28  9:35     ` 楊智成
2026-09-03  9:50       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-04  7:55         ` [RFC PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add mipi csi-2 receiver nodes for the dcphys on rk3588 Jason Yang
2026-08-31 11:32     ` [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: phy: Add PHY_TYPE_DSI and PHY_TYPE_CSI definitions Michael Riesch
2026-09-03  9:53       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-03 14:37         ` Michael Riesch
2026-08-21 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy: Allow DSI and CSI consumers Jason Yang via B4 Relay
2026-08-27 11:47   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-21 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] phy: rockchip-samsung-dcphy: Move block-level setup to runtime resume Jason Yang via B4 Relay
2026-08-21 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] phy: rockchip-samsung-dcphy: Name the transmitter helpers and ops Jason Yang via B4 Relay
2026-08-21 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] phy: rockchip-samsung-dcphy: Factor the transmitter teardown into a helper Jason Yang via B4 Relay
2026-10-10 13:21   ` Michael Riesch [this message]
2026-08-21 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] phy: rockchip-samsung-dcphy: Add a second PHY for the receiver Jason Yang via B4 Relay
2026-08-21 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] phy: rockchip-samsung-dcphy: Add MIPI D-PHY receiver support Jason Yang via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c746c60f-cc12-4827-bef2-1d1d6f605d0b@collabora.com \
    --to=michael.riesch@collabora.com \
    --cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=hero.huang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=jason98166@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®