From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/16] mm/hugetlb: use direct assignment instead of folio_change_private()
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:12:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7a5ff0c-126d-4762-8b04-5897da09b8b1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CC279633-6F0F-440C-BCDF-1D5362C4CB7B@nvidia.com>
On 9/16/26 03:56, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2026, at 22:24, Zi Yan wrote:
>
>> folio_change_private() should be used along with folio_attach_private() and
>> folio_detach_private(), where adding and remove ->private content requires
>> folio refcount change. add_hugetlb_folio() simply sets folio->private to
>> NULL without refcount manipulation. Change it to direct assignment to avoid
>> semantic confusion.
>>
>> It prepares for a future commit that remove PG_private.
>>
>> No functional change intended.
>>
>> Assisted-by: LLM
>> To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
>> To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Acked-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>> Reviewed-by: Gregory Price (Meta) <gourry@gourry.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> mm/hugetlb.c | 7 ++-----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index d3a0650ff6905..8d551cdaef9db 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -1446,11 +1446,8 @@ void add_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h, struct folio *folio,
>> }
>>
>> __folio_set_hugetlb(folio);
>> - folio_change_private(folio, NULL);
>> - /*
>> - * We have to set hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized again as above
>> - * folio_change_private(folio, NULL) cleared it.
>> - */
>> + /* Clear all folio->private flags except hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized. */
>> + folio->private = NULL;
>> folio_set_hugetlb_vmemmap_optimized(folio);
>>
>
> Sashiko[1] said when a CMA hugetlb folio is freed but fails vmemmap restore,
> add_hugetlb_folio() clears HPG_cma. It either bypasses
> hugetlb_cma_free_frozen_folio() due to the missing HPG_cma flag, or
> skips cma_release() and causes a CMA memory leak if it is free directly
> to buddy allocator. Sashiko also asked if HPG_temporary should be preserved
> as well HPG_cma.
>
> Answer:
>
> Missing HPG_cma is a real issue. It can be fixed by checking
> folio_test_hugetlb_cma(folio) at the beginning of add_hugetlb_folio() and
> setting HPG_cma after folio->private is assigned to NULL.
Maybe we should just simply only clear flags we actually want to clear ...
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 2:23 [PATCH v4 00/16] Remove PG_private by using page/folio->private checks instead Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] mm/zsmalloc: replace PG_private with pointer comparison Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] perf/ring_buffer: stop using PG_private as AUX page high-order marker Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] xen/grant-table: stop setting PG_private on pages for grant mapping Zi Yan
2026-09-14 13:15 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] fscrypt: stop setting PG_private on bounce page Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] mm/hugetlb: use direct assignment instead of folio_change_private() Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:58 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-14 13:16 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-16 1:56 ` Zi Yan
2026-09-16 6:12 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] f2fs: stop using PG_private Zi Yan
2026-09-14 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] f2fs: convert the ->private flag helpers to folio-only Zi Yan
2026-09-16 2:20 ` Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] erofs: mm/pagemap: add readahead_folio_last() to avoid folio->private Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] erofs: use folio_attach/detach_private() instead of direct assignment Zi Yan
2026-09-14 13:18 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] mm/page-flags: check page/folio->private instead of PG_private Zi Yan
2026-09-14 13:26 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 14:44 ` Zi Yan
2026-09-14 15:11 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 15:21 ` Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] treewide: remove folio_set/clear_private() usage Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] ceph: replace PagePrivate() with page_private() Zi Yan
2026-09-14 13:26 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] md/md-bitmap: " Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] buffer: replace page_buffer() with page_private() and delete it Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] treewide: remove PagePrivate() and PG_private from comments and docs Zi Yan
2026-09-14 13:36 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 2:24 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] mm/page-flags: remove PG_private Zi Yan
2026-09-14 2:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 13:37 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 13:38 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 3:39 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] Remove PG_private by using page/folio->private checks instead Andrew Morton
2026-09-15 17:16 ` Zi Yan
2026-09-15 18:18 ` Zi Yan
2026-09-14 4:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-09-14 13:10 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-14 15:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7a5ff0c-126d-4762-8b04-5897da09b8b1@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®