From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1266C76188 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 15:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7E22085A for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 15:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726680AbfGUPCz (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jul 2019 11:02:55 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]:55890 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726399AbfGUPCy (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jul 2019 11:02:54 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: ezequiel) with ESMTPSA id E8208283D5D Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] media: dvb: Provide 4 devm variants From: Ezequiel Garcia To: Marc Gonzalez , Sean Young , Brad Love , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jonathan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Neusch=E4fer?= Cc: linux-media , LKML , Bjorn Andersson , Guenter Roeck Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 12:02:44 -0300 In-Reply-To: <068836c7-a116-7e6f-cbb2-f2176fbb9a38@free.fr> References: <068836c7-a116-7e6f-cbb2-f2176fbb9a38@free.fr> Organization: Collabora Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, Thanks for your patch. On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 15:03 +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > Provide devm variants for automatic resource release on device removal. > Makes error-handling in probe() simpler, thus less error-prone. > Once all resources are devmanaged, remove() is no longer needed. > I think it would be better to add this API as part of a series that also uses it. Regards, Eze