From: "Mika Penttilä" <mika.penttila@nextfour.com>
To: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] efi: efi_mem_reserve(): don't reserve through memblock after mm_init()
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:45:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7bf34ba-56f0-8346-36d1-7069f2115dcf@nextfour.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161221182846.2968-2-nicstange@gmail.com>
On 21.12.2016 20:28, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Before invoking the arch specific handler, efi_mem_reserve() reserves
> the given memory region through memblock.
>
> efi_mem_reserve() can get called after mm_init() though -- through
> efi_bgrt_init(), for example. After mm_init(), memblock is dead and should
> not be used anymore.
>
> Let efi_mem_reserve() check whether memblock is dead and not do the
> reservation if so. Emit a warning from the generic efi_arch mem_reserve()
> in this case: if the architecture doesn't provide any other means of
> registering the region as reserved, the operation would be a nop.
>
> Fixes: 4bc9f92e64c8 ("x86/efi-bgrt: Use efi_mem_reserve() to avoid copying image data")
> Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index 92914801e388..12b2e3a6d73f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -403,7 +403,10 @@ u64 __init efi_mem_desc_end(efi_memory_desc_t *md)
> return end;
> }
>
> -void __init __weak efi_arch_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size) {}
> +void __init __weak efi_arch_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
> +{
> + WARN(slab_is_available(), "efi_mem_reserve() has no effect");
> +}
>
> /**
> * efi_mem_reserve - Reserve an EFI memory region
> @@ -419,7 +422,7 @@ void __init __weak efi_arch_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size) {}
> */
> void __init efi_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
> {
> - if (!memblock_is_region_reserved(addr, size))
> + if (slab_is_available() && !memblock_is_region_reserved(addr, size))
> memblock_reserve(addr, size);
Maybe !slab_is_available() ?
>
--Mika
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-22 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-21 18:28 [PATCH 1/2] x86/efi: don't allocate memmap " Nicolai Stange
2016-12-21 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] efi: efi_mem_reserve(): don't reserve " Nicolai Stange
2016-12-21 18:45 ` Mika Penttilä [this message]
2016-12-22 10:26 ` Nicolai Stange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7bf34ba-56f0-8346-36d1-7069f2115dcf@nextfour.com \
--to=mika.penttila@nextfour.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®