From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752099AbeCUBMC (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 21:12:02 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:56311 "EHLO mail-it0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751632AbeCUBL4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 21:11:56 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49hujae1BEO1DT3+QiMA0ur1AngmtlUi/xUqBGIe7L5QOOxA7p/9H1epbXNyexbTE1eUS46lQ== Subject: Re: linux-next on x60: network manager often complains "network is disabled" after resume From: Woody Suwalski To: Pavel Machek Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list , Netdev list References: <20180318104023.GA10392@amd> <70721f83-344a-0f23-223b-9c81f6e9e32a@gmail.com> <20180319092106.GA5683@amd> <6e43123a-5227-96c4-a1f5-4416bdb5b0db@gmail.com> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 21:11:54 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6e43123a-5227-96c4-a1f5-4416bdb5b0db@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Woody Suwalski wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: >> On Mon 2018-03-19 05:17:45, Woody Suwalski wrote: >>> Pavel Machek wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> With recent linux-next, after resume networkmanager often claims that >>>> "network is disabled". Sometimes suspend/resume clears that. >>>> >>>> Any ideas? Does it work for you? >>>>                                     Pavel >>> Tried the 4.16-rc6 with nm 1.4.4 - I do not see the issue. >> Thanks for testing... but yes, 4.16 should be ok. If not fixed, >> problem will appear in 4.17-rc1. >> > Works here OK. Tried ~10 suspends, all restarted OK. > kernel next-20180320 > nmcli shows that Wifi always connects OK > > Woody > Contrary, it just happened to me on a 64-bit build 4.16-rc5 on T440. I think that Dan's suspicion is correct - it is a snafu in the PM: trying to hibernate results in a message: Failed to hibernate system via logind: There's already a shutdown or sleep operation in progress. And ps shows "Ds /lib/systemd/systemd-sleep suspend"... Woody