From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932434AbdJZRJe (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:09:34 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:59283 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932127AbdJZRJb (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:09:31 -0400 Subject: Re: iio/accel/stk8ba50: Use common error handling code in stk8ba50_probe() To: Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Tiberiu Breana , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <5ab7e200-2dea-63e2-06db-0e185f563d16@users.sourceforge.net> <0f26a13b-7bbf-525b-a864-8aa8e13c3aef@users.sourceforge.net> <20171026174200.5c00b06d@archlinux> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 19:09:09 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171026174200.5c00b06d@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:rSX5n18P1T5s4i6LTqwE7mW1YNui3aHuOIzoKpQdQj9V/iv/PyE xgVMnInYxkZTcILXZXewnFm8V/flCEW+H6c0RAPqQRvdgbmWrzsPUThNGlEQyQI7L5S8vZj DIe0wYGVPNbQrmXahmmVcx5oYx+eua7+MC8nYebTE4muIeq2+s1a67cPfc501LH7wt01U9l tXjzb1LK3yP7ajjf2W1Fg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:WTr/VXyAcMs=:V1DVNUWtBpEMyiQ3PRLfKz opRDUgu0zf7FT9A1rSdrbCysWY20O0bKtztwj8yGC6pzQlbWQGmo+ELFWZEyMdUCqiyXKBhzC gPbzTu4URzNfFr7LyzOZ6ZVUHhWtWTjvKtUWCgP1Suangft+4stFlz18P+5bsNpkWmyyQb3/a 8PiQw9iiE2UdWEY+hctigrMRj0zz0zm+ejDaX0JG0DmxXwl62GXV1rjSXn7ifjqlu+tpuTCqr 6zb8lfqV4KqauU5VW7HezL1uypFCIN0vWLd5lhNokUFfgMhVyJ6DPDDGZMXip1bwKKBmFRivz zxiifEf6Tvp2FKh4dJZM/N/8q9ymu5IanpW6vc0CjVxYJ7AgrSrScNJwa2GRYgKNEdHTEmWUP soxKzLWRad4ezEYNjpd90Srq1HArkaedSCYdEgFjk/2u3PrKFHFrYAE0HAC+Rk6Qsfp99QUUC ms/4pyoilRQnebjtDWZEqOLFg8tovXBrUEbw/LhWvefleXTabqbN5W+eyjui7sk3SIIY25W1z jYatLvW4xKx9/jBggj7Ha4yUrv8e/GK25eSpAzmV9n6457SNV1dR2uVusmi8goGrxntkB3WT8 xPE8xQ+JXNUt+A+xCFg6u4I3pThGmQarC2pGaWRtu4sY3hnqfCTYKzRrHAZE6sIlToqVHpoby Mn/0DghYzdpQIPBN9uB67aJOu5/FrVnL3OJNngcAgCl8maTq7+BY2VYkCu1rEnNSU026AkcKb +xTf8vVT/5UCnh/dppEOlT7fFrK7JD+ssYyFktV+l5zCmO+oPrbIOZBhZODwcYDDWuG0jUY35 UkmGT5MR2LwiPPdYuyusX7Tc7xDF/hwAAs7fdyqOQHs09e3QIo= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Again, a general kernel development rule is to float only one > patch of a given type until you have had feedback on it. Some update suggestions according also to this general source code transformation pattern were already integrated in other software areas. > These backwards goto cases are sufficiently different from your earlier > patch that got reviews that, They are required if you would ever like to support software refactorings in directions which I propose occasionally. > at most, you should have sent one to the list and then given time > for it to be properly reviewed (up to a week on IIO list typically). Did I present my ideas a bit too quick in this case? Regards, Markus