Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: qcom: add hexagon based WCSS secure PIL driver

[Gokul Sriram P <quic_gokulsri@quicinc.com>]

On 8/20/2024 4:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 02:25:15PM +0530, Gokul Sriram Palanisamy wrote:
>> From: Vignesh Viswanathan <quic_viswanat@quicinc.com>
>>
>> Add support to bring up hexagon based WCSS secure PIL remoteproc.
>> IPQ5332, IPQ9574 supports secure PIL remoteproc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Viswanathan <quic_viswanat@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Gokul Sriram Palanisamy <quic_gokulsri@quicinc.com>
>> +static int wcss_sec_dump_segments(struct rproc *rproc,
>> +				  const struct firmware *fw)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
>> +	struct reserved_mem *rmem = NULL;
>> +	struct device_node *node;
>> +	int num_segs, index = 0;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	/* Parse through additional reserved memory regions for the rproc
>> +	 * and add them to the coredump segments
>> +	 */
>> +	num_segs = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node,
>> +					      "memory-region", NULL);
>> +	while (index < num_segs) {
>> +		node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node,
>> +					"memory-region", index);
>> +		if (!node)
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +		rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(node);
>> +		if (!rmem) {
>> +			dev_err(dev, "unable to acquire memory-region index %d num_segs %d\n",
>> +				index, num_segs);
> Leaking refcnt.
Got it. Will update. Thank you.
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		of_node_put(node);
>> +
>> +		dev_dbg(dev, "Adding segment 0x%pa size 0x%pa",
>> +			&rmem->base, &rmem->size);
>> +		ret = rproc_coredump_add_custom_segment(rproc,
>> +							rmem->base,
>> +							rmem->size,
>> +							wcss_sec_copy_segment,
>> +							NULL);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +
>> +		index++;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct rproc_ops wcss_sec_ops = {
>> +	.start = wcss_sec_start,
>> +	.stop = wcss_sec_stop,
>> +	.da_to_va = wcss_sec_da_to_va,
>> +	.load = wcss_sec_load,
>> +	.get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>> +	.panic = wcss_sec_panic,
>> +	.parse_fw = wcss_sec_dump_segments,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int wcss_sec_alloc_memory_region(struct wcss_sec *wcss)
>> +{
>> +	struct reserved_mem *rmem = NULL;
>> +	struct device_node *node;
>> +	struct device *dev = wcss->dev;
>> +
>> +	node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "memory-region", 0);
>> +	if (node) {
>> +		rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(node);
>> +	} else {
> No, that's over complicated.
>
> Just if (!node) { error handling }.
Ok. Will update.
>> +		dev_err(dev, "can't find phandle memory-region\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	of_node_put(node);
>> +
>> +	if (!rmem) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	wcss->mem_phys = rmem->base;
>> +	wcss->mem_reloc = rmem->base;
>> +	wcss->mem_size = rmem->size;
>> +	wcss->mem_region = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, wcss->mem_phys, wcss->mem_size);
>> +	if (!wcss->mem_region) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to map memory region: %pa+%pa\n",
>> +			&rmem->base, &rmem->size);
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
> ...
>
>> +static int wcss_sec_ipq5332_init_clk(struct wcss_sec *wcss)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct device *dev = wcss->dev;
>> +
>> +	wcss->im_sleep = devm_clk_get(wcss->dev, "im_sleep");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(wcss->im_sleep)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(wcss->im_sleep);
>> +		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to get im_sleep clock");
> Syntax is return dev_err_probe.
Thanks. Will update.
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(wcss->im_sleep);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "could not enable im_sleep clk\n");
>> +		return ret;
> Just use devm_clk_get_enabled.
Will update.
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>