mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: x86: SVM: fix avic_kick_target_vcpus_fast
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 15:21:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7fb78e2-2650-f9a2-3062-5d5ecc34332b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220606180829.102503-5-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

On 6/6/22 20:08, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> There are two issues in avic_kick_target_vcpus_fast
> 
> 1. It is legal to issue an IPI request with APIC_DEST_NOSHORT
>     and a physical destination of 0xFF (or 0xFFFFFFFF in case of x2apic),
>     which must be treated as a broadcast destination.
> 
>     Fix this by explicitly checking for it.
>     Also don’t use ‘index’ in this case as it gives no new information.
> 
> 2. It is legal to issue a logical IPI request to more than one target.
>     Index field only provides index in physical id table of first
>     such target and therefore can't be used before we are sure
>     that only a single target was addressed.
> 
>     Instead, parse the ICRL/ICRH, double check that a unicast interrupt
>     was requested, and use that info to figure out the physical id
>     of the target vCPU.
>     At that point there is no need to use the index field as well.
> 
> 
> In addition to fixing the above	issues,	also skip the call to
> kvm_apic_match_dest.
> 
> It is possible to do this now, because now as long as AVIC is not
> inhibited, it is guaranteed that none of the vCPUs changed their
> apic id from its default value.
> 
> 
> This fixes boot of windows guest with AVIC enabled because it uses
> IPI with 0xFF destination and no destination shorthand.
> 
> Fixes: 7223fd2d5338 ("KVM: SVM: Use target APIC ID to complete AVIC IRQs when possible")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>

Is it possible to use kvm_intr_is_single_vcpu_fast, or am I missing 
something?

Series queued, thanks.

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-08 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-06 18:08 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: x86: AVIC/APICv patch queue Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-06 18:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: x86: document AVIC/APICv inhibit reasons Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-06 18:08 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: x86: inhibit APICv/AVIC when the guest and/or host changes either apic id or the apic base from their default values Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-07  7:05   ` Chao Gao
2022-06-07  7:53     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-06 18:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: x86: SVM: remove avic's broken code that updated APIC ID Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-06 18:08 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: x86: SVM: fix avic_kick_target_vcpus_fast Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-08 13:21   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-06-09  8:13     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-06 18:08 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: x86: disable preemption while updating apicv inhibition Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-06 18:08 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: x86: disable preemption around the call to kvm_arch_vcpu_{un|}blocking Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-06 18:08 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: x86: SVM: there is no need for preempt safe wrappers for avic_vcpu_load/put Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c7fb78e2-2650-f9a2-3062-5d5ecc34332b@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®