From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] block: fail atomic writes instead of falling back to buffered I/O
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 16:09:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7fc92de-7196-4af2-acb8-fe849af70754@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828-blkdev-fixes-v2-5-32f3f40cebed@columbia.edu>
On 8/28/26 3:49 PM, Tal Zussman wrote:
> An IOCB_ATOMIC direct write to a block device can silently lose its
> torn-write guarantee in two ways:
>
> 1. blkdev_direct_write() turns an -EBUSY from page cache invalidation
> into a 0 return, so the whole write is retried through
> blkdev_buffered_write(), with no atomicity guarantee.
>
> 2. On a partial page pin, __blkdev_direct_IO_simple() and
> __blkdev_direct_IO_async() submit what was pinned with REQ_ATOMIC
> set and leave the rest to the buffered fallback.
>
> The second case can be triggered deterministically. A 16K
> pwritev2(RWF_ATOMIC) whose last page is PROT_NONE, on a scsi_debug
> device with atomic_wr=1, completes short with only three of the four
> pages written, violating RWF_ATOMIC semantics.
>
> Fail the I/O instead. Return -EAGAIN when page cache invalidation fails
> for IOCB_ATOMIC rather than retrying through the page cache, matching
> __iomap_dio_rw(), which treats the failure as transient and lets the
> caller retry. Release a short atomic pin and return -EFAULT before
> submission, which is what a direct write already returns when none of
> the buffer can be pinned. A sync atomic write can then never return
> short with a remainder, so the buffered fallback is never reached.
>
> ext4 has the same fallback and only warns in it. For block devices both
> ways in can be detected before any I/O is submitted, so fail early instead.
>
> Fixes: caf336f81b3a ("block: Add fops atomic write support")
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260802-blkdev-fixes-v1-0-a82fc549fd74%40columbia.edu?part=2
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>
> ---
> block/fops.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 13:49 [PATCH v2 0/7] block device fixes for large block sizes, IOCB_NOWAIT, and direct I/O Tal Zussman
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] block: use iomap_dirty_folio for block devices Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 12:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] block: take i_rwsem for the direct I/O write fallback Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 12:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-09-04 16:22 ` Tal Zussman
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] block: take i_rwsem for the splice read path Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 12:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] block: honor IOCB_NOWAIT in the block device buffered " Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 13:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] block: fail atomic writes instead of falling back to buffered I/O Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 14:09 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] block: unpin all pages of a bvec in bio_iov_iter_align_down() Tal Zussman
2026-08-28 14:36 ` Tal Zussman
2026-09-02 14:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-08-28 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] block: remove dead metadata handling from the async direct I/O path Tal Zussman
2026-08-28 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] block device fixes for large block sizes, IOCB_NOWAIT, and direct I/O Tal Zussman
2026-09-04 16:19 ` Tal Zussman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7fc92de-7196-4af2-acb8-fe849af70754@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®