mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
To: Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: chipidea: Grab the (legacy) USB PHY by phandle first
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:32:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c80ee02db4a22d15a24281384ae561462593684f.camel@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB53274C03CD18C3D3ADB767408B630@VI1PR04MB5327.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 03:04 +0000, Peter Chen wrote:
> > According to the chipidea driver bindings, the USB PHY is specified via the "phys"
> > phandle node. However, this only takes effect for USB PHYs that use the common
> > PHY framework. For legacy USB PHYs, a simple lookup based on the USB PHY
> > type is done instead.
> > 
> > This does not play out well when more than one USB PHY is registered, since the
> > first registered PHY matching the type will always be returned regardless of what
> > the driver was bound to.
> > 
> > Fix this by looking up the PHY based on the "phys" phandle node.
> > Although generic PHYs are rather matched by their "phys-name" and not the "phys"
> > phandle directly, there is no helper for similar lookup on legacy PHYs and it's
> > probably not worth the effort to add it.
> > 
> > When no legacy USB PHY is found by phandle, fallback to grabbing any registered
> > USB2 PHY. This ensures backward compatibility if some users were actually relying
> > on this mechanism.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v2:
> > * Fixed typos in commit message.
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > * Only consider legacy USB PHY error for fallback as suggested;
> > * Checked against EPROBE_DEFER before entering fallback.
> > 
> >  drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c index
> > 7bfcbb23c2a4..016e4004fe9d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > @@ -954,8 +954,15 @@ static int ci_hdrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	} else if (ci->platdata->usb_phy) {
> >  		ci->usb_phy = ci->platdata->usb_phy;
> >  	} else {
> > +		ci->usb_phy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev->parent, "phys",
> > +							  0);
> >  		ci->phy = devm_phy_get(dev->parent, "usb-phy");
> > -		ci->usb_phy = devm_usb_get_phy(dev->parent,
> > USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
> > +
> > +		/* Fallback to grabbing any registered USB2 PHY */
> > +		if (IS_ERR(ci->usb_phy) &&
> > +		    PTR_ERR(ci->usb_phy) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +			ci->usb_phy = devm_usb_get_phy(dev->parent,
> > +						       USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
> > 
> 
> I think you may need to do above if ci->phy is error, and not the error is -EPROBE_DEFER.

As Thomas pointed out during the review of v1, the initial flow is to
try and get both ci->usb_phy and ci->phy and let the code use ci->phy
in priority later.

This change attempts to keep this flow intact. The EPROBE_DEFER check
is in case the initial ci->usb_phy is valid but deferred: we don't want
to overwrite it by calling devm_usb_get_phy which might return an
actual error and result in losing the EPROBE_DEFER information.

Does that make sense to you?

Cheers,

Paul

> Peter
> 
> >  		/* if both generic PHY and USB PHY layers aren't enabled */
> >  		if (PTR_ERR(ci->phy) == -ENOSYS &&
> > --
> > 2.20.1
-- 
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-18  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-15 16:22 Paul Kocialkowski
2019-02-18  3:04 ` Peter Chen
2019-02-18  8:32   ` Paul Kocialkowski [this message]
2019-02-21  3:29     ` Peter Chen
2019-02-21  8:22       ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-02-21  8:37         ` Peter Chen
2019-02-21  8:44           ` Paul Kocialkowski
2019-02-21  9:30             ` Peter Chen
2019-02-21 10:48               ` Paul Kocialkowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c80ee02db4a22d15a24281384ae561462593684f.camel@bootlin.com \
    --to=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®