From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>,
Prem Nath Dey <prem.nath.dey@intel.com>,
Xiaoping Zhou <xiaoping.zhou@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/paravirt: Disable virt spinlock on bare metal
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:24:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c83127de-b59a-4475-8d20-e3582ee2e6f8@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240526015847.14142-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com>
On 26.05.24 г. 4:58 ч., Chen Yu wrote:
> The kernel can change spinlock behavior when running as a guest. But
> this guest-friendly behavior causes performance problems on bare metal.
> So there's a 'virt_spin_lock_key' static key to switch between the two
> modes.
>
> The static key is always enabled by default (run in guest mode) and
> should be disabled for bare metal (and in some guests that want native
> behavior).
>
> Performance drop is reported when running encode/decode workload and
> BenchSEE cache sub-workload.
> Bisect points to commit ce0a1b608bfc ("x86/paravirt: Silence unused
> native_pv_lock_init() function warning"). When CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
> is disabled the virt_spin_lock_key is incorrectly set to true on bare
> metal. The qspinlock degenerates to test-and-set spinlock, which
> decrease the performance on bare metal.
>
> Fix this by disabling virt_spin_lock_key if it is on bare metal,
> regardless of CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS.
>
nit:
This bug wouldn't have happened if the key was defined FALSE by default
and only enabled in the appropriate case. I think it makes more sense to
invert the logic and have the key FALSE by default and only enable it
iff the kernel is running under a hypervisor... At worst only the
virtualization case would suffer if the lock is falsely not enabled.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-18 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-26 1:58 Chen Yu
2024-06-18 1:46 ` Chen Yu
2024-06-18 8:24 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2024-06-19 15:25 ` Chen Yu
2024-06-19 15:34 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-06-19 15:48 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c83127de-b59a-4475-8d20-e3582ee2e6f8@suse.com \
--to=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=prem.nath.dey@intel.com \
--cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoping.zhou@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®