mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/restrack: Fix potential invalid address access
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 22:17:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c84561e1-0fc5-4381-961f-a246b577938f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240307091317.GA8392@unreal>

On 2024/3/7 17:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:55:15PM +0800, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>> struct rdma_restrack_entry's kern_name was set to KBUILD_MODNAME
>> in ib_create_cq(), while if the module exited but forgot del this
>> rdma_restrack_entry, it would cause a invalid address access in
>> rdma_restrack_clean() when print the owner of this rdma_restrack_entry.
>>
>> Fix this issue by using kstrdup() to set rdma_restrack_entry's
>> kern_name.
> 
> I don't like kstrdup() and would like to avoid it, this rdma_restrack_clean()
> is purely for debugging and for a long time all upstream ULPs are "clean"
> from these not-released bugs.
> 
> So my suggestion is to delete that part of code and it will be good enough.
> 

It's OK for me. When found this issue, my first plan is to remove the code, but
I do not know why these code is added, so decide to using kstrdup() to work around
it.

Then what to do next? Do I need to post another patch or you would fix it by yourself?

> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/restrack.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/restrack.c
> index 01a499a8b88d..27727138f188 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/restrack.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/restrack.c
> @@ -60,47 +60,14 @@ static const char *type2str(enum rdma_restrack_type type)
>   void rdma_restrack_clean(struct ib_device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct rdma_restrack_root *rt = dev->res;
> -	struct rdma_restrack_entry *e;
> -	char buf[TASK_COMM_LEN];
> -	bool found = false;
> -	const char *owner;
>   	int i;
>   
>   	for (i = 0 ; i < RDMA_RESTRACK_MAX; i++) {
>   		struct xarray *xa = &dev->res[i].xa;
>   
> -		if (!xa_empty(xa)) {
> -			unsigned long index;
> -
> -			if (!found) {
> -				pr_err("restrack: %s", CUT_HERE);
> -				dev_err(&dev->dev, "BUG: RESTRACK detected leak of resources\n");
> -			}
> -			xa_for_each(xa, index, e) {
> -				if (rdma_is_kernel_res(e)) {
> -					owner = e->kern_name;
> -				} else {
> -					/*
> -					 * There is no need to call get_task_struct here,
> -					 * because we can be here only if there are more
> -					 * get_task_struct() call than put_task_struct().
> -					 */
> -					get_task_comm(buf, e->task);
> -					owner = buf;
> -				}
> -
> -				pr_err("restrack: %s %s object allocated by %s is not freed\n",
> -				       rdma_is_kernel_res(e) ? "Kernel" :
> -							       "User",
> -				       type2str(e->type), owner);
> -			}
> -			found = true;
> -		}
> +		WARN_ON(!xa_empty(xa));
>   		xa_destroy(xa);
>   	}
> -	if (found)
> -		pr_err("restrack: %s", CUT_HERE);
> -
>   	kfree(rt);
>   }
>   
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/infiniband/core/restrack.c | 6 ++++--
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/restrack.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/restrack.c
>> index 01a499a8b88d..6605011c4edc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/restrack.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/restrack.c
>> @@ -177,7 +177,8 @@ static void rdma_restrack_attach_task(struct rdma_restrack_entry *res,
>>   void rdma_restrack_set_name(struct rdma_restrack_entry *res, const char *caller)
>>   {
>>   	if (caller) {
>> -		res->kern_name = caller;
>> +		kfree(res->kern_name);
>> +		res->kern_name = kstrdup(caller, GFP_KERNEL);
>>   		return;
>>   	}
>>   
>> @@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ void rdma_restrack_parent_name(struct rdma_restrack_entry *dst,
>>   			       const struct rdma_restrack_entry *parent)
>>   {
>>   	if (rdma_is_kernel_res(parent))
>> -		dst->kern_name = parent->kern_name;
>> +		dst->kern_name = kstrdup(parent->kern_name, GFP_KERNEL);
>>   	else
>>   		rdma_restrack_attach_task(dst, parent->task);
>>   }
>> @@ -306,6 +307,7 @@ static void restrack_release(struct kref *kref)
>>   		put_task_struct(res->task);
>>   		res->task = NULL;
>>   	}
>> +	kfree(res->kern_name);
>>   	complete(&res->comp);
>>   }
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.32.0
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-07 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-01  9:55 Wenchao Hao
2024-03-03 12:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-04  3:21   ` Wenchao Hao
2024-03-04  7:35     ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-04 13:33       ` Wenchao Hao
2024-03-07  9:13 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-07 14:17   ` Wenchao Hao [this message]
2024-03-10  9:24     ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c84561e1-0fc5-4381-961f-a246b577938f@huawei.com \
    --to=haowenchao2@huawei.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®