From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 609E51DC9BF; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737157111; cv=none; b=C1ax7ZyChDWVwKnN5WVnUfp27IneGXJ1TpXt2+z32cY/fPZlaaZSc93UqDJWx06M5DxfaM1NMoQAfte42k9xM23RJbVsbrakTGUJjQtQXDe6WG7AQCTR5H3RzP/lOuwbS941qonGGSx609ZSmacrNxQNHgYS1ZwL7vei8xA4Zjg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737157111; c=relaxed/simple; bh=W9rauymGG636CzhmZXtNuGeLAsbJMLCdwK9H+eidk8k=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=aFA+cFYIVka40Wfr6PVUoiDxIhG1+9ZjeCeEQm6+h0O7DZ2+zdmFAaMo0J97Z3imJBkkeWliiLc4BXdclzRSXArrDuRpR/yw4qWwTczp8nehA5KtdpzbPmDo6mVy401ix03uC1wPAGxHnSbwcNHXvKHjeiORUkswMZdC9PhZrL8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=pYcwOns4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="pYcwOns4" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 50HLQM6g022186; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:37:56 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=W9rauy mGG636CzhmZXtNuGeLAsbJMLCdwK9H+eidk8k=; b=pYcwOns44wCMZzTbAMQ8IE bCUFj0VxjiFEMTv5tF5rsp7u9MvUWwSB+99pgXd/7/YmowL7S0mUXDsIJ9RAiAM+ dvmPDW7hlsdC3HJNB7gpDb5FEvtBB9g2jPszStI8pi1cfNIAQEB71sYp6BL/+1sK hj87AC0Z7D8w54Zr6dUMVCPZ8fSqNuFOW+7wyd+iFdyOhWM8Cka9G4lesagJU4D/ XGYPp/epgJ7Cb4qsCoEDOcExjt3tAurFTOu18Q42LztbV1h85/lQTkbddOwd6tMn 4W4zGA6vFDV+xPpliPZtui9o/xz0rSE+s4NnbDaJrc/eqLoBddyRMlUZdHE7Q3SQ == Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 447rp5aduj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:37:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0353725.ppops.net (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 50HNbtU8014859; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:37:55 GMT Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 447rp5adug-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:37:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 50HL5LdH002681; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:37:54 GMT Received: from smtprelay06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.73]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4443byncu0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:37:54 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.100]) by smtprelay06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 50HNbrWu19661388 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:37:54 GMT Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12AC58058; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:37:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D100B58057; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:37:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-43857255-d5e6-4659-90f1-fc5cee4750ad.ibm.com (unknown [9.61.15.82]) by smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:37:52 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ima: kexec: silence RCU list traversal warning From: Mimi Zohar To: Breno Leitao , Roberto Sassu , Dmitry Kasatkin , Eric Snowberg , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Morton Cc: Mimi Zohar , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 18:37:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20250116-jovial-stalwart-chipmunk-0b3693@leitao> References: <20241121-ima_rcu-v2-1-4d48630cf2c6@debian.org> <20250116-jovial-stalwart-chipmunk-0b3693@leitao> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.4 (3.52.4-2.fc40) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: m7v_Lu-HEIawRgNyj2ekpfxpwt6-e_Ah X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: DOQNup_8nTHermrQQJMUD-CTbY0aaqf3 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1057,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.68.34 definitions=2025-01-17_08,2025-01-16_01,2024-11-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=711 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2411120000 definitions=main-2501170182 On Thu, 2025-01-16 at 03:23 -0800, Breno Leitao wrote: > Hello Mimi, >=20 > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 01:57:12AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote: > > The ima_measurements list is append-only and doesn't require > > rcu_read_lock() protection. However, lockdep issues a warning when > > traversing RCU lists without the read lock: > >=20 > > =C2=A0 security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:40 RCU-list traversed in non-= reader > > section!! >=20 > What are the next steps in regarding this issue? I am still seeing this > problem on Linus' tree. It's included in the v6.14 pull request, which I just sent. thanks, Mimi