From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [jlayton:mgtime 5/13] inode.c:undefined reference to `__invalid_cmpxchg_size'
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 19:06:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8e44728-6c09-4fbe-9583-1f8298c3ea39@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <edd2d831320fb14333e605e77d4b284b1123eb86.camel@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 17:27, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 17:07 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 16:23, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> The context for this is generally a write or other change to an inode,
> so I too am hoping the overhead won't be too bad. It does take great
> pains to avoid changing the ctime_floor value whenever possible.
Ok, I see. Have you considered hooking directly into the code
in kernel/time/timekeeping.c then?
Since the coarse time is backed by the timekeeper that itself
is a cache of the current time, this would potentially avoid
some duplication:
- whenever the tk_core code gets updated, you can update
the ctime_floor along with it, or integrate ctime_floor
itself into the timekeeper
- you can use the same sequence count logic, either with the
same &tk_core.seq or using a separate counter for the
ctime updates
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-09 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <202407091931.mztaeJHw-lkp@intel.com>
2024-07-09 11:58 ` Fwd: " Jeff Layton
2024-07-09 13:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-07-09 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-09 14:23 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-09 15:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-09 15:27 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-09 17:06 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-07-09 18:27 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-10 8:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-10 11:57 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8e44728-6c09-4fbe-9583-1f8298c3ea39@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®