From: <Takahiro.Kuwano@infineon.com>
To: <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, <mwalle@kernel.org>
Cc: <pratyush@kernel.org>, <richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
<tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: Rework flash parameter initialization
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 00:13:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8f082b6deb4483b9a6a5f54ac549d62@infineon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tsrlmf7g.fsf@bootlin.com>
Hi,
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 01/06/2026 at 14:52:42 +02, Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Try to simplify the flash initialization and get rid of the legacy
> > handling. As default, all the flags of the in-kernel database are
> > taken and amended with the SFDP data.
> >
> > This might have the consequence that all the flashes now get a
> > RDSFPD opcode which might be an unknown opcode. But that was already
> > the case for any flashes which were unknown to the linux kernel. So
> > far, there was not a single complaint.
> >
> > See patch 3 for more information. If feedback is positive, this is
> > intended to be applied to the spi-nor tree after the next merge
> > window, so it will sit around in -next for quite some time and get
> > some testing.
> >
> > That being said, I've just did a quick test on my boards. Please
> > give it a test on your boards.
>
> Interesting cleanup, thanks for pushing it. I'll run some tests with
> some old and newer SFDP based flashes. I do not have chips without SFDP
> though.
>
I do have some non-SFDP chips (S25FL-S). Will get back to you with test
result.
Thanks,
Takahiro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 12:52 Michael Walle
2026-06-01 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: spansion: s25fl256s0: remove SKIP_SFDP flag Michael Walle
2026-06-02 9:57 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-06-02 11:01 ` Michael Walle
2026-06-05 8:05 ` Takahiro.Kuwano
2026-06-05 13:05 ` Tudor Ambarus
2026-06-01 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: don't clear the SNOR_F_4B_OPCODES flag on failure Michael Walle
2026-06-02 9:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-06-05 8:15 ` Takahiro.Kuwano
2026-06-05 13:05 ` Tudor Ambarus
2026-06-01 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mtd: spi-nor: rework flash parameter initialization Michael Walle
2026-06-05 13:17 ` Tudor Ambarus
2026-06-02 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: Rework " Miquel Raynal
2026-06-03 0:13 ` Takahiro.Kuwano [this message]
2026-06-05 8:50 ` Takahiro.Kuwano
2026-07-02 2:39 ` Cheng Ming Lin
2026-07-02 15:17 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-07-07 6:35 ` Michael Walle
2026-07-06 6:24 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-07-06 7:33 ` Michael Walle
2026-07-06 13:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-07-06 14:16 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8f082b6deb4483b9a6a5f54ac549d62@infineon.com \
--to=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox