From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0A313DDAE for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766503285; cv=none; b=Az/uABT8kWJsmHMUq9p8bMrYf2PVDiMou5xRNEwsMrGPjlgiQokIkovMMj+bIl8s/zeHnlax+WnRGjm6NBwYASad8iHh3FZlsujzHtkSS6drE9aeDHFR+bGenBdM+G2Lckf3sq6NfucFCIFlCuu5StrOQAybSauH3sNNlUkF+Qc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766503285; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mP2xfOnRZfIAueUZPo5/b7tVu1PN2HIzvA4puU7q8mA=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=DRXcJyIJGwViqdZyKIGuqsdHqo19fb0xdN9+KbD3z2jIibDwsiU1ouLO3UZJFZBzQJ0rvWRyAjj9qCeF10S1OXIGCCXM2c1l6rTbSSFhUKNAb7+hBPLIoN7IAZ44DlXbvrcdMXzlOP96f5L2cQVuCi3x7kToEph3fesizNmYagw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Pe8scNCT; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=hR4y/LDO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Pe8scNCT"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="hR4y/LDO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1766503282; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=mP2xfOnRZfIAueUZPo5/b7tVu1PN2HIzvA4puU7q8mA=; b=Pe8scNCTsICK4IV1swHr4Uk86FXp3O+7KBUqOYp6hcybBvO9knp3Pi3NyQUxMYHtTZM9qe BMsdGFa1b1pJApyPymq9tuSBDeA4LvwWuzRwFG9H7wng20otykk48QeTjLHBGTKvtXsPQA OLA6dTXBbpCw8XTNCyilxeZZuFia9iY= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-404-xiF5b43SOS-lT4GEhbePWA-1; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 10:21:20 -0500 X-MC-Unique: xiF5b43SOS-lT4GEhbePWA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: xiF5b43SOS-lT4GEhbePWA_1766503279 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-430fc83f58dso2896693f8f.2 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:21:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1766503279; x=1767108079; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:autocrypt :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mP2xfOnRZfIAueUZPo5/b7tVu1PN2HIzvA4puU7q8mA=; b=hR4y/LDOFcmzttv783IKmj3SF7zNeELw6owi7prSGY/Z9gLbYlluHE/xvhPSXKKkEh U1rsbu0cb3j5e/MFzLcY2mjbYc1wqHHTajWlfY8wdulWC5xYOgxCOQ/xQKMZmQRLdAkR +/vy+EVnh11dnFyW2/ev48/wXzELvYnTISnT9ItmI/eep94MqMyGRLqEAv2CceONJHz5 zPITkluctWmTv28wDojtqT88QiTMvlC+SumJTvQgXX911F8QKwTwT29X0rDCyA0lNw0O zapdgXVEagewo54lB1IL8j4JuHbbDUrN2HuQTvo7+qKAOjZd7GhhH7DO8JvVnRi9YAxf 1x+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1766503279; x=1767108079; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:autocrypt :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mP2xfOnRZfIAueUZPo5/b7tVu1PN2HIzvA4puU7q8mA=; b=w9zKYNWKrWFnCKTR14Z0Tce6khW01jR0VNb8mxohnsGzSRoeCKNhlCv0mgiKcvnzf7 7xhTaNuy8Gm5IMq4Zh9ctyb8XBQdIICfoKyGoRjPSK7KOP04l5ySTlTi4dbJtxRDKscc 7gqRkkwZljE6suy4URkRmytDLQf0QcwWrHy5skMsU21OqmObc7DGWhx07ODqFawjU111 jg+gfSLA7elQPpuiLqgh/Gu+Rd8Iba594bXb3f6W9xFq4JB+pIT9KL/5a2MUTP9UjWCM SGW4tXdy+4HHH1WAa3lcOwDhw/UBPpBwHLjwE+jIVSUWPk9d/gVS3lImele0mzLtxHf2 mjxg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUgE3kMuB+2r6KG9BhLL5R8juSm0Geu003pOqX19+ZmMScpkyU/kE/YKmrayisE/I9p+bvo39MZJGSf2q4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyeZNJN9Fylt5uuSjpr+KwnUIkg+JHIin5DcdaWiPO6fz0y9Hgc 85eDQTVakLgdsuEErqvAGv9CNSwNGIkNqXONTNgtaNXwcSDl7LLadXsunfyI3D33n7W8ltQJbzL K+o7NY+8C0cSmrorpM5f6l+3GWvrU8z2d4RwIqbyUoi2cV2V2tSEfeKqEM452ROTrmg== X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX5+fvfCVC4mOfEbMeKIBxQAZkww7LrqMIuwpv/860qgcsxxQ5/apvyRVkGduYn HjcZsBxCeZE5i/uLB2V4zlPHWRVnjeLcBj0dV6lfRXe2TfPKwViad8cC6R5yj8Xwpw8yg+ltepx 4TtzwD37Mo0OwiM0NQ8HGh3OT0QR4yxXmPBXyapkFaGFrCtGhmpkFcGoLKXRPIsKnruNXV+UHKV WjiuJaLAmTpjj4Ouh3zDfTMKY7mHxkfqSGp4Lex4+wSQ8yo3KDKTC5hj7In8/CfAaMWoUJTeVm/ wPYgXgRqsuM3U91z2adqSxyyCPE9XrPVUfDwmtZk8FDzEP/oBiL2Vh9MYzPcXb0veleKJYkHNra Ml5JpE7p4s6AYN5y2RUWJqieZeHry0iXqeKQKVQ+z2UeTdXzBto64pwL3HaY+DZN9yXU0kmWOtl YJ53E2mW0+ X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5885:0:b0:431:5ac:1df with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4324e4c0a8emr17448188f8f.11.1766503279354; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:21:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHYAqtmVXRmtmnSXxRYPfwHaCOlHVNgXuHEop9haWGNrA8D+acuq+GtZUVEOtNJU1zZ6J3S9g== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5885:0:b0:431:5ac:1df with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4324e4c0a8emr17448163f8f.11.1766503278954; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:21:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmonaco-thinkpadt14gen3.rmtit.csb (185-132-178-103.hosted-by-worldstream.net. [185.132.178.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4324ea226d1sm29012815f8f.13.2025.12.23.07.21.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:21:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Question] Detecting Sleep-in-Atomic Context in PREEMPT_RT via RV (Runtime Verification) monitor rtapp:sleep From: Gabriele Monaco To: Yunseong Kim , Nam Cao Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , rostedt@goodmis.org, Tomas Glozar , Shung-Hsi Yu , Byungchul Park , syzkaller@googlegroups.com, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, LKML , Dan Carpenter Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 16:21:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <92a7c013-0676-4c81-867f-b55c69a1edd6@kzalloc.com> References: <32839fb6-dbcb-4c5c-9e3f-d46f27ae9a73@kzalloc.com> <87fraslu9c.fsf@yellow.woof> <87jyz5kuf2.fsf@yellow.woof> <20251202112644.YUux4LKd@linutronix.de> <53f17978-40e5-4b2e-b719-552612b0e775@kzalloc.com> <871pl1y3oh.fsf@yellow.woof> <0d06ce4c-6ff2-401a-90d9-5a4dfd2abebb@kzalloc.com> <92a7c013-0676-4c81-867f-b55c69a1edd6@kzalloc.com> Autocrypt: addr=gmonaco@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=mDMEZuK5YxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAmJ3dM9Sz6/Hodu33Qrf8QH2bNeNbOikqYtxWFLVm0 1a0JEdhYnJpZWxlIE1vbmFjbyA8Z21vbmFjb0BrZXJuZWwub3JnPoiZBBMWCgBBFiEEysoR+AuB3R Zwp6j270psSVh4TfIFAmjKX2MCGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwICIgIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgcCF4AACgk Q70psSVh4TfIQuAD+JulczTN6l7oJjyroySU55Fbjdvo52xiYYlMjPG7dCTsBAMFI7dSL5zg98I+8 cXY1J7kyNsY6/dcipqBM4RMaxXsOtCRHYWJyaWVsZSBNb25hY28gPGdtb25hY29AcmVkaGF0LmNvb T6InAQTFgoARAIbAwUJBaOagAULCQgHAgIiAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeBwIXgBYhBMrKEfgLgd0WcK eo9u9KbElYeE3yBQJoymCyAhkBAAoJEO9KbElYeE3yjX4BAJ/ETNnlHn8OjZPT77xGmal9kbT1bC1 7DfrYVISWV2Y1AP9HdAMhWNAvtCtN2S1beYjNybuK6IzWYcFfeOV+OBWRDQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.2 (3.58.2-1.fc43) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Yunseong, > I will also double-check sleepable memory allocations in the context of > PREEMPT_RT kernels to see if there are other patterns being missed. You may want to play with lockdep as well, it's much heavier but can catch = a lot of those issues. I believe it still relies on annotations though, so it mig= ht have blind spots too (though it's battle-tested on locks). > My interest in this arose because I've been seeing these legacy patterns > consistently reported as bugs in the Real-Time (PREEMPT_RT) kernel. It > seems many kernel developers are still unaware that these patterns are > problematic, partly because some older Linux learning materials actually > recommended them. This makes it quite likely that such code will continue > to find its way into the upstream. Yeah that's quite common indeed, I see kernel functions claiming to be atom= ic while in fact using (sleeping) spinlocks. Reading the material Daniel left (RV's original author), he thought of a si= milar model, so at least we know there was interest in this kind of thing. > I will keep looking into more meaningful contributions for RV. For instan= ce, > I=E2=80=99ve been considering a monitor to detect excessive memory compac= tion issues > under specific workloads, which I=E2=80=99ve encountered during kernel de= velopment. Looking forward to knowing more! Cheers, Gabriele