From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com (mail-wr1-f46.google.com [209.85.221.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF59135417 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:33:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726562006; cv=none; b=KpLH7J0u17zN2BU+vlpY0zkoQgV9a5tyiMvPSl0DIOCOkVTvlr6SfC9MqEImPN5qL0nxP5ZnX7249NTb2Jzr/eBlv6k4fq31Ac+rlGM0luUKw7Q2z+9oK627pCwRFcD4tjPs4iQ5RVrvLQdvRnlVZ910tRVhFHCG9H3KR9sDPy8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726562006; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iE2Wv0+cvG+2aZXxRAF3RlJ75YbC/cTAt9RJEO8/fHg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=rbCRRlAHsxxrxA16N/HHzt4IcviqFs2DgG3Q2SjKdbCFEFQn0AQXejZxAVdHq1dBOZ22DUNWM94LAc61dWO7WHvwRy3xnyQR9by13AKU7tYiugnmPMgfFlQiNoCzdhhncSW2XU/1/zYXlWqUrTSryZvvP2mMMEQXKmajfAJOQwY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=SRauZwM4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="SRauZwM4" Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-374d29ad8a7so3768458f8f.2 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:33:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1726562003; x=1727166803; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uaZq80rKA8PR8arvgj14dSjlnVlXU4VT+sLVAjweGL4=; b=SRauZwM42G6Xa00/XBZ2NeTSacSd+kn0+obCBNuVj1l+QpZQDISie/gcfB92flBvl1 Q2eETmWFBLopQtl5CEOo2H3lkxuITkkd8+/6n8GBIc4U7xA/uVDT1rm+auvJZgyOdYco F6RXDyJY6gdzNVmjmtk054YdVuOy4cqLoTgiTinOETQoD1PqH9cx6/YZMSqhSeHMYZQ5 co0/NZINcqxy8cfbO+qsvaTeOmPCAEQsUdPvQEJexPGRSU4fgWghggPj93vB1a3njphT zUkxi5tvCel2dT6UYNMFNL+ox86NQouy4/8L9Jf061BYCwyH3Rt88whvXG722rgMo3ap 3WyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1726562003; x=1727166803; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uaZq80rKA8PR8arvgj14dSjlnVlXU4VT+sLVAjweGL4=; b=hzxpCGJ6ck33BLSYa9GjkezRiSNDa7chpUnk6tSh3CEbVBd5/Fuj3FFGN7un30kdW4 PoCx0OKK05O4UXAD2OdnWlA3He5nrm/u6i8kubqV9gG23jVxpH+6NWlWeyos8Nsiyz02 02zd7Y1CIKYIX0AsBZbUEFmMrRWM6c4+t61G/yLLhbhxAty0WrXcMtHeOMRe4ZgvD06O fyMTXM1hCV8AEwVAeWLRGtfE5F/Pn2GFaMa+C3Fou0nkcC2S2HB6OWxIeN5zOyoXfrw9 IRHbEh2LHcC4PtRcePrqO0mnkSt6rui1dA9UVzoOFD1kRndGJdI4LlVEfYusBi+yGpyF XcaQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXPOT9+B4EwAn+k3fqBIxwzSH8S7qIsFHDpS3/hkIXlxiK4nf40mfRWXiC3urMMIpC8Z7WAkmgor8zSUiY=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+Pgk/+cIEC4foAUnD9EyWLZsO1U02MbM5viuTaHgG+fUu5nHp 72RYXz1URzqKVKcEAJ7cWXW/zgSLTcqkJ+kXkjqXYaUdoACQKpKMvWtdyy1BSqQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE18tMydtbEAct5RuY9jItVP08eE6+B7i44g5FEd+bUiIHVt16rsPdFoWrSWWWG6HoY9IImXA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4983:0:b0:374:c1f9:ea79 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-378c2cd5e5fmr10660845f8f.5.1726562002356; Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:a61:13ed:c201:b884:edfc:abaf:1cf4? ([2001:a61:13ed:c201:b884:edfc:abaf:1cf4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-378e780e14fsm8894819f8f.117.2024.09.17.01.33.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 10:33:21 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: use mutex_lock in iowarrior_read() To: Jeongjun Park , Oliver Neukum Cc: Greg KH , colin.i.king@gmail.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240916040629.28750-1-aha310510@gmail.com> <2024091648-excusable-unfilled-83de@gregkh> <15bc0f3a-5433-43e0-b0b0-8b9c26dec165@suse.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Oliver Neukum In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 17.09.24 08:23, Jeongjun Park wrote: > Oliver Neukum wrote: > Okay. But O_NONBLOCK flag check already exists, and I don't know > if we need to branch separately to mutex_trylock just because O_NONBLOCK > flag exists. I think mutex_lock_interruptible is enough. It will still block. > And the point of locking is too late. I think it would be more appropriate to > read file->private_data and then lock it right away. You are right. dev->present should be checked under the lock only. > I think this patch is a more appropriate patch: > > --- > drivers/usb/misc/iowarrior.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/iowarrior.c b/drivers/usb/misc/iowarrior.c > index 6d28467ce352..6fb4ecebbc15 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/misc/iowarrior.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/iowarrior.c > @@ -277,28 +277,40 @@ static ssize_t iowarrior_read(struct file *file, > char __user *buffer, > struct iowarrior *dev; > int read_idx; > int offset; > + int retval = 0; > > dev = file->private_data; > > + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->mutex)) { This blocks. To quote the man page: O_NONBLOCK or O_NDELAY When possible, the file is opened in nonblocking mode. Neither the open() nor any subsequent I/O operations on the file descriptor which is returned will cause the calling process to wait. [..] > +unlock_exit: > + mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex); > +exit: > + return retval; The rest looks good to me. Regards Oliver