mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>, Zhi Wang <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>,
	Gourry <gourry@gourry.net>,
	Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Alex Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/migrate_device: avoid out-of-bounds writes for compound folios
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 15:43:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c99ca53a-73ef-4a0c-8738-eba1cc89bea2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909112049.3202956-1-sh_def@163.com>

On 9/9/26 13:20, Hui Su wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 02:23:33PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> That's what I was thinking: because how should we partially migrate folios?
>> Doesn't make sense :)
>>
>> If this cannot be triggered today, neither Fixes: nor CC: stable is appropriate.
>>
>> Agreed that we should just warn.
> 
> Hi David, Matthew,
> 
> Sorry, I missed this earlier.
> 
> This fix has already landed in mainline, but I agree that the API semantics
> should be clarified. Partially migrating a compound folio does not make
> sense. If the intended contract is that callers must not provide a range
> that cuts through a compound folio, then treating such input as caller
> misuse with an explicit WARN/error path sounds reasonable.
> 
> The reason I added the Fixes tag and Cc'd stable was that I observed an
> actual KASAN out-of-bounds write with the HMM migrate_anon_huge_zero
> selftest. The path was:
> 
>   dmirror_fops_release()
>     -> dmirror_device_evict_chunk()
>       -> migrate_device_range()
> 
> My intent was to prevent migrate_device_range() from writing past the
> caller-provided src_pfns array when such an input is observed. That said,
> silently stopping the collection is not necessarily the best API semantics
> if this should be treated as caller misuse.
> 
> I will rerun the reproducer on current mainline and report back with the
> result. If the preferred direction is to make this an explicit WARN/error
> path instead, I can send a follow-up patch on top of mainline.

Yes, and please clean up the code in any case; the duplication should be avoided.

-- 
Cheers,

David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-17 12:08 Hui Su
2026-08-17 18:21 ` Andrew Morton
2026-08-18 11:13   ` Balbir Singh
2026-08-27 15:14 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-28  4:44   ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-07 12:23     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-09 11:20       ` Hui Su
2026-09-09 13:43         ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-09-11  5:40           ` Hui Su

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c99ca53a-73ef-4a0c-8738-eba1cc89bea2@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=sh_def@163.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®