mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junxian Huang <huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 0/2] Small optimization for ib_map_mr_sg() and ib_map_mr_sg_pi()
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:41:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9aaf37b-c6d8-0609-0113-449a635ddfc2@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106133646.GE5006@unreal>



On 2024/11/6 21:36, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 09:12:47PM +0800, Junxian Huang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2024/11/6 20:08, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:08:39PM +0800, Junxian Huang wrote:
>>>> ib_map_mr_sg() and ib_map_mr_sg_pi() allow ULPs to specify NULL as
>>>> the sg_offset/data_sg_offset/meta_sg_offset arguments. Drivers who
>>>> need to derefernce these arguments have to add NULL pointer checks
>>>> to avoid crashing the kernel.
>>>>
>>>> This can be optimized by adding dummy sg_offset pointer to these
>>>> two APIs. When the sg_offset arguments are NULL, pass the pointer
>>>> of dummy to drivers. Drivers can always get a valid pointer, so no
>>>> need to add NULL pointer checks.
>>>>
>>>> Junxian Huang (2):
>>>>   RDMA/core: Add dummy sg_offset pointer for ib_map_mr_sg() and
>>>>     ib_map_mr_sg_pi()
>>>>   RDMA: Delete NULL pointer checks for sg_offset in .map_mr_sg ops
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c         | 12 +++++++++---
>>>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c         | 18 ++++++------------
>>>>  drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/trace_mr.h |  2 +-
>>>>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> So what does this change give us?
>>> We have same functionality, same number of lines, same everything ...
>>>
>>
>> Actually this is inspired by an hns bug. When ib_map_mr_sg() passes a NULL
>> sg_offset pointer to hns_roce_map_mr_sg(), we dereference this pointer
>> without a NULL check.
>>
>> Of course we can fix it by adding NULL check in hns, but I think this
>> patch may be a better solution since the sg_offset is guaranteed to be
>> a valid pointer. This could benefit future drivers who also want to
>> dereference sg_offset, they won't need to care about NULL checks.
> 
> Let's fix hns please. We are moving away from SG in RDMA.
> 

Sure, thanks

Junxian

>>
>> Junxian
>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.33.0
>>>>
>>>>

      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-07  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-05 12:08 Junxian Huang
2024-11-05 12:08 ` [PATCH for-next 1/2] RDMA/core: Add dummy sg_offset pointer " Junxian Huang
2024-11-05 12:08 ` [PATCH for-next 2/2] RDMA: Delete NULL pointer checks for sg_offset in .map_mr_sg ops Junxian Huang
2024-11-06 12:08 ` [PATCH for-next 0/2] Small optimization for ib_map_mr_sg() and ib_map_mr_sg_pi() Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-06 13:12   ` Junxian Huang
2024-11-06 13:36     ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-07  1:41       ` Junxian Huang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c9aaf37b-c6d8-0609-0113-449a635ddfc2@hisilicon.com \
    --to=huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=tangchengchang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®