From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot@kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Krystian Kaniewski <krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix out-of-bounds read in blk_mq_free_rqs
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:44:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9ff6779-feb0-489e-a6ee-9477fd105e61@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c92b0c7e-17fb-44c8-99d9-59d45004d05a@mail.kernel.org>
On 9/10/26 3:49 PM, syzbot wrote:
> From: Krystian Kaniewski <krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com>
>
> A KASAN slab-out-of-bounds read can occur in blk_mq_free_rqs() when there
> is a mismatch between the number of hardware queues allocated for the IO
> scheduler (et->nr_hw_queues) and the number of hardware queues in the block
> tag set (set->nr_hw_queues).
>
> This mismatch can happen if blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() fails halfway
> through (e.g., due to memory pressure during
> blk_mq_prealloc_tag_set_tags()). In this error path, the elevator is
> restored with a larger number of hardware queues than the block tag set
> actually has.
>
> When the elevator is later freed, blk_mq_free_sched_tags() iterates up to
> the new et->nr_hw_queues and calls blk_mq_free_rqs(). In blk_mq_free_rqs(),
> it attempts to access set->tags[hctx_idx] to get the driver tags. Because
> set->nr_hw_queues was not updated due to the earlier failure, set->tags
> still has the old (smaller) size, leading to an out-of-bounds read.
>
Yes makes sense, this scenario seems feasible.
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in blk_mq_free_rqs+0xde/0x680
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff88818d67fc28 by task syz-executor117/5839
> Call Trace:
> blk_mq_free_rqs+0xde/0x680
> blk_mq_free_map_and_rqs+0x40/0xf0
> blk_mq_free_sched_tags
> blk_mq_free_sched_res+0xeb/0x280
> elevator_change_done+0x1d2/0x5c0
> elevator_change+0x34f/0x480
> elv_iosched_store+0x504/0x630
> queue_attr_store+0x207/0x2b0
>
> To fix this, explicitly check if hctx_idx < set->nr_hw_queues before
> accessing set->tags[hctx_idx]. If hctx_idx >= set->nr_hw_queues, the
> hardware queue doesn't exist in the tag set, meaning there are no driver
> tags to clear mappings from. In this case, safely set drv_tags to NULL. The
> subsequent call to blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping() already handles a NULL
> drv_tags pointer and will safely return.
>
Fix looks reasonable.
> This fix also prevents a similar out-of-bounds read in the failure path of
> blk_mq_alloc_rqs(), where a failure during new driver tag allocation could
> lead to blk_mq_free_rqs() being called with an hctx_idx greater than or
> equal to set->nr_hw_queues.
>
I'm not sure if this is possible. Looking at the callers of blk_mq_alloc_rqs(),
the allocation loops appear to be bounded by set->nr_hw_queues, so an
hctx_idx >= set->nr_hw_queues should not be passed to blk_mq_alloc_rqs() in
that path. Nevertheless, the guard in blk_mq_free_rqs() looks reasonable as
a defensive check and fixes the reported failure.
> Fixes: 04225d13aef1 ("block: fix potential deadlock while running nr_hw_queue update")
> Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.5-flash Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview syzbot
> Reported-by: syzbot+e90526cab23b9efcd03c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e90526cab23b9efcd03c
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/ai_job?id=827b5760-86a0-4f44-9c69-430b572eac12
> Signed-off-by: Krystian Kaniewski <krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 2c850330a..8e6726b37 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3473,8 +3473,10 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
>
> if (blk_mq_is_shared_tags(set->flags))
> drv_tags = set->shared_tags;
> - else
> + else if (hctx_idx < set->nr_hw_queues)
> drv_tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
> + else
> + drv_tags = NULL;
>
> if (tags->static_rqs && set->ops->exit_request) {
> int i;
Thanks for the fix! Overall, this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Nilay Shorff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 10:19 syzbot
2026-09-10 15:14 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c9ff6779-feb0-489e-a6ee-9477fd105e61@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®