From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>, mst@redhat.com, elic@nvidia.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mlx5_vdpa: defer clear_virtqueues to until DRIVER_OK
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:00:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca25b0fd-5871-2543-d802-b10ed2a1d3a4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00d3ec60-3635-a5f1-15fc-21e6ce53202b@oracle.com>
On 2021/2/10 上午8:26, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 2/8/2021 7:37 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/2/6 下午8:29, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>>> While virtq is stopped, get_vq_state() is supposed to
>>> be called to get sync'ed with the latest internal
>>> avail_index from device. The saved avail_index is used
>>> to restate the virtq once device is started. Commit
>>> b35ccebe3ef7 introduced the clear_virtqueues() routine
>>> to reset the saved avail_index, however, the index
>>> gets cleared a bit earlier before get_vq_state() tries
>>> to read it. This would cause consistency problems when
>>> virtq is restarted, e.g. through a series of link down
>>> and link up events. We could defer the clearing of
>>> avail_index to until the device is to be started,
>>> i.e. until VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK is set again in
>>> set_status().
>>>
>>> Fixes: b35ccebe3ef7 ("vdpa/mlx5: Restore the hardware used index
>>> after change map")
>>> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>> b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>> index aa6f8cd..444ab58 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>> @@ -1785,7 +1785,6 @@ static void mlx5_vdpa_set_status(struct
>>> vdpa_device *vdev, u8 status)
>>> if (!status) {
>>> mlx5_vdpa_info(mvdev, "performing device reset\n");
>>> teardown_driver(ndev);
>>> - clear_virtqueues(ndev);
>>> mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr(&ndev->mvdev);
>>> ndev->mvdev.status = 0;
>>> ++mvdev->generation;
>>> @@ -1794,6 +1793,7 @@ static void mlx5_vdpa_set_status(struct
>>> vdpa_device *vdev, u8 status)
>>> if ((status ^ ndev->mvdev.status) &
>>> VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) {
>>> if (status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) {
>>> + clear_virtqueues(ndev);
>>
>>
>> Rethink about this. As mentioned in another thread, this in fact
>> breaks set_vq_state(). (See vhost_virtqueue_start() ->
>> vhost_vdpa_set_vring_base() in qemu codes).
> I assume that the clearing for vhost-vdpa would be done via (qemu code),
>
> vhost_dev_start()->vhost_vdpa_dev_start()->vhost_vdpa_call(status |
> VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)
>
> which is _after_ vhost_virtqueue_start() gets called to restore the
> avail_idx to h/w in vhost_dev_start(). What am I missing here?
>
> -Siwei
I think not. I thought clear_virtqueues() will clear hardware index but
looks not. (I guess we need a better name other than clear_virtqueues(),
e.g from the name it looks like the it will clear the hardware states)
Thanks
>
>
>>
>> The issue is that the avail idx is forgot, we need keep it.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>> err = setup_driver(ndev);
>>> if (err) {
>>> mlx5_vdpa_warn(mvdev, "failed to setup driver\n");
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-10 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-06 12:29 [PATCH 1/3] mlx5_vdpa: should exclude header length and fcs from mtu Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-06 12:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] mlx5_vdpa: fix feature negotiation across device reset Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-08 4:37 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-08 5:35 ` Eli Cohen
2021-02-09 1:20 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-10 12:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-06 12:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] mlx5_vdpa: defer clear_virtqueues to until DRIVER_OK Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-08 4:38 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-08 5:48 ` Eli Cohen
2021-02-09 1:40 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-09 3:37 ` Jason Wang
2021-02-10 0:26 ` Si-Wei Liu
2021-02-10 4:00 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2021-02-08 4:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] mlx5_vdpa: should exclude header length and fcs from mtu Jason Wang
2021-02-08 5:35 ` Eli Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca25b0fd-5871-2543-d802-b10ed2a1d3a4@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®