From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout09.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout09.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F1CC32BF44 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.224 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774344621; cv=none; b=ge06pojHo8ecojaFcKOMSNGS2jfI6A9UQ151j0JCcNuKTAXIiyrGgl4Rfz+Tc09IurjofPr4lEF3qWCdryAaOnZjIMoRaIfEzWrGytMn81wmZe8Wa23nzmhoKItBV/Kf9RrI/Ql7TcnHiRj5rUAXPSSXxCiBp4ui0ElfloLwDmc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774344621; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xCfVB+8Yjaq9fuw65gJZLfVs60mNgLkbY0fG9kjmDXY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=VvPqfR+Ns30ISTsRnq5woxhex1r6NfzJkgQ94PPgYA56XAduhKex6zOEFLA0h9BSzC5WvOolWXQFu6sfqYYwv1okX+rsr8dnH/60d7hnk0ZWQ2v3IqU3BFIhGx/zywSmm5wGvyu8mNhCt1kqBWXHas2pvVr1SQb80XL9trii5Og= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=kpMPl3LL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.224 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="kpMPl3LL" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=taUqtCi2vlxxccKzv1LC+mi+qctm2JrXoQKBlOmS+t0=; b=kpMPl3LLh2rDIDcTlbN7Cx2lHpCjOnilr1hb58ITKgVub89AZjrfRFkop3zPjUhbr+zVfHPWD ZwIkYoNahDgE98DcGdND4jvt+B+n9bLlFKv2i+pNtSXXxFMzeRNTegRgbISCqgW+0rSsXy2SReE 6hOcTP0GjfwciEQZFXc8ako= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.214]) by canpmsgout09.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4fg4Nf17zfz1cyPF; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:24:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggemv705-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [10.3.19.32]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E9754056C; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:30:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemq100007.china.huawei.com (7.202.195.175) by dggemv705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:30:06 +0800 Received: from [10.159.167.44] (10.159.167.44) by kwepemq100007.china.huawei.com (7.202.195.175) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:30:05 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:30:04 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND drm-dp 0/4] Fix some bugs in the hibmc driver To: "tzimmermann@suse.de" , "tiantao (H)" , "xinliang.liu@linaro.org" , "maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com" , "mripard@kernel.org" , "airlied@gmail.com" , "daniel@ffwll.ch" , "kongxinwei (A)" , "dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com" , CC: "Liangjian(Jim,Kunpeng Solution Development Dept)" , Chenjianmin , "fengsheng (A)" , "helin (T)" , "shenjian (K)" , shaojijie , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20260312074202.1491504-1-shiyongbang@huawei.com> From: Yongbang Shi In-Reply-To: <20260312074202.1491504-1-shiyongbang@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems500002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.17) To kwepemq100007.china.huawei.com (7.202.195.175) Hi Thomas, Dmitry, I have a question, this patch was sent in 2026.3.12, back when Linux was in the mainline linux 7.0-rc4 stage, and it still hasn't been accepted. Since this is a bug fix, I'd like to get it accepted into the mainline as soon as possible. Should I add "drm-misc-fixes" to the subject line to specify that it should be sent to that branch? By the way, If I need to resend it with subject-prefix "drm-misc-fixes", I'll remove the "Reviewed-by: Tao Tian " and reply via email.Thanks, Yongbang > From: Lin He > > There are some bugfix for hibmc-drm driver. > > Lin He (4): > drm/hisilicon/hibmc: add updating link cap in DP detect() > drm/hisilicon/hibmc: fix no showing when no connectors connected > drm/hisilicon/hibmc: move display contrl config to hibmc_probe() > drm/hisilicon/hibmc: use clock to look up the PLL value > > drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_comm.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_link.c | 2 +- > .../gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_de.c | 80 +++++++++++-------- > .../gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_dp.c | 35 +++++--- > .../gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.c | 14 ++++ > .../gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_drv.h | 1 + > .../gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/hibmc_drm_vdac.c | 74 ++++++++--------- > 8 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) >