mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mikie <mikie.pl@gmail.com>
To: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@nul.nu>
Cc: "Duncan Sands" <duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: understanding firmware loader for speedtouch (kernel 2.6.21.5)
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:49:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca35ce500707090149x78a424f6t9d687893c0d657f6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58019.81.207.0.53.1183749400.squirrel@secure.samage.net>

2007/7/6, Indan Zupancic <indan@nul.nu>:
> On Fri, July 6, 2007 16:20, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > On Friday 6 July 2007 14:54:18 mikie wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I experience some problems with the speedtch.c module, especially in
> >> regards to its firmware loader.
> >> I am not quite sure if this module is going to load the firmware
> >> itself or does it use some external software to do that ?
> >
> > It loads it itself, using some external software!
>
> For information, it generates a hotplug event and the kernel calls the
> program written at /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug with certain information.
> That used to be /sbin/hotplug, became later udev, but today in general
> udev reads the uevents generated by the kernel.

On my system the /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug points to /sbin/hotplug.
I copied your script to /sbin/hotplug and also added simple logging,
so I can see whenever the script is being started. It turns out that
the script is not started at all by the kernel...

I am afraid that the kernel generates uevents only, could this be true?

The timeout value in /sys/class/firmware/timeout is 60 and it seems to
be working correctly (see logs with exactly 1 minute delay before next
find_firmware event)
As I check the debug log I can see some uevents :

Jul  9 09:03:19 srv kernel: speedtch 1-2:1.0: usbatm_usb_probe: using
3392 byte buffer for rx channel 0xc5577ca0
Jul  9 09:03:19 srv kernel: speedtch 1-2:1.0: usbatm_usb_probe: using
3392 byte buffer for tx channel 0xc5577ce8
Jul  9 09:03:19 srv kernel: speedtch 1-2:1.0: speedtch_find_firmware:
looking for speedtch-1.bin.2.00
Jul  9 09:03:19 srv kernel: DEV: registering device: ID = '1-2:1.0'
Jul  9 09:03:19 srv kernel: PM: Adding info for No Bus:1-2:1.0
Jul  9 09:03:19 srv kernel: dev_uevent: class uevent() returned -19
Jul  9 09:03:19 srv kernel: bound device '1-2:1.0' to driver 'speedtch'
Jul  9 09:03:19 srv kernel: usb: Bound Device 1-2:1.0 to Driver speedtch
Jul  9 09:04:07 srv kernel: drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c: speedtch_usb_cleanup
Jul  9 09:04:07 srv kernel: bus usb: remove driver speedtch
Jul  9 09:04:07 srv kernel: speedtch 1-2:1.0: usbatm_usb_disconnect entered
Jul  9 09:04:19 srv kernel: DEV: Unregistering device. ID = '1-2:1.0'
Jul  9 09:04:19 srv kernel: PM: Removing info for No Bus:1-2:1.0
Jul  9 09:04:19 srv kernel: speedtch 1-2:1.0: speedtch_find_firmware:
looking for speedtch-1.bin.2
Jul  9 09:04:19 srv kernel: DEV: registering device: ID = '1-2:1.0'
Jul  9 09:04:19 srv kernel: PM: Adding info for No Bus:1-2:1.0
Jul  9 09:04:19 srv kernel: dev_uevent: class uevent() returned -19
Jul  9 09:05:19 srv kernel: DEV: Unregistering device. ID = '1-2:1.0'
Jul  9 09:05:19 srv kernel: PM: Removing info for No Bus:1-2:1.0
Jul  9 09:05:19 srv kernel: speedtch 1-2:1.0: speedtch_find_firmware:
looking for speedtch-1.bin
Jul  9 09:05:19 srv kernel: DEV: registering device: ID = '1-2:1.0'
Jul  9 09:05:19 srv kernel: PM: Adding info for No Bus:1-2:1.0
Jul  9 09:05:19 srv kernel: dev_uevent: class uevent() returned -19
Jul  9 09:06:19 srv kernel: DEV: Unregistering device. ID = '1-2:1.0'
Jul  9 09:06:19 srv kernel: PM: Removing info for No Bus:1-2:1.0
Jul  9 09:06:19 srv kernel: speedtch 1-2:1.0: speedtch_unbind entered
Jul  9 09:06:19 srv kernel: speedtch 1-2:1.1: usbatm_usb_disconnect entered
Jul  9 09:06:19 srv kernel: speedtch 1-2:1.1: usbatm_usb_disconnect:
NULL instance!

Mostly I think I should be worried about "dev_uevent: class uevent()
returned -19".
It sounds like the uevent failed? I do not have udevd, but still I
thought that in such case the kernel will use the script from
/proc/sys/kernel/hotplug but apparently it does not. Is there any
config option to choose between udev or hotplug in the kernel source ?

Regards,
MK

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-09  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-06 12:54 mikie
2007-07-06 14:20 ` Duncan Sands
2007-07-06 19:16   ` Indan Zupancic
2007-07-09  8:49     ` mikie [this message]
2007-07-09 10:42       ` Indan Zupancic
2007-07-09 11:08         ` mikie
2007-07-09 13:59           ` Kay Sievers
2007-07-09 14:40             ` mikie
2007-07-09 15:03               ` Indan Zupancic
2007-07-09 17:00                 ` mikie
     [not found]                   ` <200707091923.38577.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr>
2007-07-09 17:41                     ` mikie
2007-07-09 17:51                       ` Duncan Sands
2007-07-10  7:54                     ` mikie
2007-07-10  8:57                       ` Duncan Sands
2007-07-10  9:13                         ` mikie
2007-07-10  9:32                           ` Duncan Sands
2007-07-10 10:32                             ` mikie
2007-07-11 11:22                               ` mikie
2007-07-11 12:33                                 ` Duncan Sands
2007-07-11 12:47                                   ` mikie
2007-07-11 13:07                                     ` Duncan Sands
2007-07-11 16:55                                       ` mikie
2007-07-19 10:24                                         ` mikie
2007-07-24 23:03                                           ` Duncan Sands
2008-11-19 12:25                                             ` mikie
2008-11-19 12:49                                               ` Duncan Sands
2007-07-09 15:08               ` Kay Sievers
2007-07-09 10:50       ` Duncan Sands
2007-07-09 11:06         ` mikie
     [not found]   ` <ca35ce500707061006k74754bd6m8a9d2f1cb2910823@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <200707061924.57099.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr>
2007-07-06 19:30       ` mikie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca35ce500707090149x78a424f6t9d687893c0d657f6@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mikie.pl@gmail.com \
    --cc=duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr \
    --cc=indan@nul.nu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®