From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751669AbeBBK3V (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 05:29:21 -0500 Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.24]:54593 "EHLO lb1-smtp-cloud7.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750773AbeBBK3M (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Feb 2018 05:29:12 -0500 Subject: Re: Adjustments for a lot of function implementations To: SF Markus Elfring , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Cc: Julia Lawall , Jan Kara , Lorenzo Stoakes , Michal Hocko , Muralidharan Karicheri , LKML References: <356f75b2-d303-7f10-b76c-95e2f686bd3c@xs4all.nl> <14619198-bebe-d215-5324-a14fbc2103fb@users.sourceforge.net> <049aa1b4-6291-ec24-1ffb-77ae8d1cdb63@users.sourceforge.net> <804550a6-1096-12f1-a0ec-1ccd6bcc191e@xs4all.nl> From: Hans Verkuil Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 11:29:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPGiM2msZF9Dvy0g8j5OCqqyl/5FGbagjbP5LwIEFoBRuisVM9ZUSKl63ppZQDgth4PQVmEvR/WMmsrbISxFE1nrFV2G5ReMXxAE5ckCfBUnBvrJwsbr YmEHTZuOqYqU8T/6/+LyeMQySmzRtPJn2wZHXqhU+FT3xFJxPLC9R2BfRtZHgx+6DgU9/lo2kitQQiLZBLOz50xo7gdptibm/X6keEUvD0N2jtzohpSvB6Tk 9x5sCCS0afcW5aPI8RxCaH5Wb8OZ0de2lCihbRE8baY0HimPdCvvY35Yzhnl+RI+p7iDQoxSs+AS9mXxEL87cyQjjx0AqqXJQh1Myd2RF2JE+1wI9xmBFS9y gkZkXUHzbQACXHl2gPQOrKsJ3mfQh7D5+xWt9Yu5D7uBO8GSAGt1VzNXW1G8oF69RFE5uwLS7raNgCmshqNDn9DumfpVwB+CN/fjYhbWBRx6Kwhk5HdR9A8O 51lEXYkc8czkUrqsmYXER+xqPl0L7nA2NeQa+/iyEyI5xaQmn689UoL/4mwtg/iCSo3JHNUIp8+YgEHqfCl7jajLaqf5xsadZA5XOJpbFrCPaEpjPUOUV3O2 TONmTxtsX0nIcBsTB+no15c/T5eipLj1P8PNzRgP/H0p0zo6NR12UgO91Ke5raCSQmCbtSuM00NuL5R+NeoAiPwuqMle00SSC/HqTkzT1lu+sA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/02/18 10:55, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> ??? I did that: either one patch per directory with the same type of change, >> or one patch per driver combining all the changes for that driver. > > Do any contributors get into the mood to take another look at software updates > from my selection of change possibilities in a more constructive way? > > Do you need any additional development resources? One last time: either post per-driver patches with all the cleanups for a driver in a single patch, or a per-directory patch (drivers/media/pci, usb, etc) doing the same cleanup for all drivers in that directory. I prefer the first approach, but it's up to you. We don't have the time to wade through dozens of one-liner cleanup patches. I don't understand what is so difficult about this. Regards, Hans