mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: "Jeff Johnson" <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
	"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
	"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"Nobuhiro Iwamatsu" <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:06:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca6b4ce2-4ebf-409d-b87d-2024445b9392@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240607-md-drivers-pwm-v1-1-27237a2bec6a@quicinc.com>

Il 07/06/24 18:02, Jeff Johnson ha scritto:
> make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-imx1.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.o
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-visconti.o
> 
> Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
> ---
> This addresses all of the issues in driver/pwm
> 
> Let me know if you want any of the individual module changes
> segregated into separate patches.
> ---
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-imx1.c      | 1 +
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c     | 1 +
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.c | 1 +
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c  | 1 +
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c       | 1 +
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c   | 1 +
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c     | 1 +
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-visconti.c  | 1 +
>   8 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 

..snip..

> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> index 19a87873ad60..0b5d68a90e83 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> @@ -395,4 +395,5 @@ static struct platform_driver pwm_mediatek_driver = {
>   module_platform_driver(pwm_mediatek_driver);
>   
>   MODULE_AUTHOR("John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MediaTek Pulse Width Modulator driver");

MediaTek SoCs have got two different PWM IPs, one of which is used exclusively
for the Display PWM, and it is located in the DDP block.

So, there are two PWM IPs in one SoC:
  - A general purpose PWM IP
  - A DDP PWM IP

This driver is for the general purpose PWM IP.. so, please, can we change this
to "MediaTek general purpose Pulse Width Modulator driver"?

After which,

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

>   MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-10  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-07 16:02 Jeff Johnson
2024-06-07 16:34 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-06-10  8:06 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message]
2024-06-10  9:05   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-06-10 14:51     ` Jeff Johnson
2024-06-10 14:44   ` Jeff Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca6b4ce2-4ebf-409d-b87d-2024445b9392@collabora.com \
    --to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp \
    --cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®