From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3635C433DF for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73B820663 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="B57VcRK1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730293AbgEZPqw (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 11:46:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58564 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728303AbgEZPqv (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 11:46:51 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8756FC03E96D; Tue, 26 May 2020 08:46:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=f5trgiJH5V/8C2C/LXnwvUAj6Z8CNkwv12V2Vhc+Pn4=; b=B57VcRK1h7jmKgXnMJAs+RL/9Q HL21I+jvKaM0Z6V3jxHUi2GruRwLyizy9RoGE8/ZCNHtcadJBRc0z/6UcqFgZsEE/Iz1/A3okBmy/ dHU9C75GHE2f8cn6DfAioBeoDy2ZVfJtJw1zC5yedsZGJUsjIhiNHLEdbiG6KZ2GF55iy+y+Tq51o KnIj6SndpsBmssq20QfWfVtYhKpedxFz1WZ94oG7k0JLgEjKPhjNqUCHXTb4SjVW0cUnOFyyJqAKy gC+EcvLdWl1C6dgWEQG6v227zmcgmm9ppKvgC7OZ0xTwvUlhtrpYR1SU52icI5aaLX6NMiag2HBN5 vQXhQyCQ==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0::19c2] by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jdbn1-0003Kd-02; Tue, 26 May 2020 15:46:51 +0000 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c) To: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Crypto Mailing List , Ayush Sawal , Vinay Kumar Yadav , Rohit Maheshwari References: <20200526203932.732df7c6@canb.auug.org.au> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 08:46:49 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200526203932.732df7c6@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/26/20 3:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > News: there will be no linux-next release tomorrow. > > Changes since 20200525: > on i386: when CONFIG_IPV6 is not set/enabled: CC drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.o In file included from ../include/linux/tcp.h:19:0, from ../include/net/tls.h:41, from ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.h:8, from ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:6: ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c: In function 'chcr_ktls_act_open_req6': ../include/net/sock.h:380:37: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_rcv_saddr'; did you mean 'skc_rcv_saddr'? #define sk_v6_rcv_saddr __sk_common.skc_v6_rcv_saddr ^ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:257:37: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_rcv_saddr' cpl->local_ip_hi = *(__be64 *)&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr.in6_u.u6_addr8[0]; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../include/net/sock.h:380:37: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_rcv_saddr'; did you mean 'skc_rcv_saddr'? #define sk_v6_rcv_saddr __sk_common.skc_v6_rcv_saddr ^ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:258:37: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_rcv_saddr' cpl->local_ip_lo = *(__be64 *)&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr.in6_u.u6_addr8[8]; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../include/net/sock.h:379:34: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_daddr'; did you mean 'skc_daddr'? #define sk_v6_daddr __sk_common.skc_v6_daddr ^ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:259:36: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_daddr' cpl->peer_ip_hi = *(__be64 *)&sk->sk_v6_daddr.in6_u.u6_addr8[0]; ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../include/net/sock.h:379:34: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_daddr'; did you mean 'skc_daddr'? #define sk_v6_daddr __sk_common.skc_v6_daddr ^ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:260:36: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_daddr' cpl->peer_ip_lo = *(__be64 *)&sk->sk_v6_daddr.in6_u.u6_addr8[8]; ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c: In function 'chcr_setup_connection': ../include/net/sock.h:379:34: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_daddr'; did you mean 'skc_daddr'? #define sk_v6_daddr __sk_common.skc_v6_daddr ^ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:295:27: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_daddr' ipv6_addr_type(&sk->sk_v6_daddr) == IPV6_ADDR_MAPPED)) { ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../include/net/sock.h:380:37: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_rcv_saddr'; did you mean 'skc_rcv_saddr'? #define sk_v6_rcv_saddr __sk_common.skc_v6_rcv_saddr ^ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:302:29: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_rcv_saddr' (const u32 *)&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr.in6_u.u6_addr8, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c: In function 'chcr_ktls_dev_del': ../include/net/sock.h:379:34: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_daddr'; did you mean 'skc_daddr'? #define sk_v6_daddr __sk_common.skc_v6_daddr ^ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:400:26: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_daddr' (const u32 *)&sk->sk_v6_daddr.in6_u.u6_addr8, ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c: In function 'chcr_ktls_dev_add': ../include/net/sock.h:379:34: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_daddr'; did you mean 'skc_daddr'? #define sk_v6_daddr __sk_common.skc_v6_daddr ^ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:494:27: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_daddr' ipv6_addr_type(&sk->sk_v6_daddr) == IPV6_ADDR_MAPPED)) { ^~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../arch/x86/include/asm/string.h:3:0, from ../include/linux/string.h:20, from ../arch/x86/include/asm/page_32.h:35, from ../arch/x86/include/asm/page.h:14, from ../arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:12, from ../include/linux/thread_info.h:38, from ../arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:7, from ../include/linux/preempt.h:78, from ../include/linux/spinlock.h:51, from ../include/linux/wait.h:9, from ../include/linux/wait_bit.h:8, from ../include/linux/fs.h:6, from ../include/linux/highmem.h:5, from ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:5: ../include/net/sock.h:379:34: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_v6_daddr'; did you mean 'skc_daddr'? #define sk_v6_daddr __sk_common.skc_v6_daddr ^ ../arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:182:45: note: in definition of macro 'memcpy' #define memcpy(t, f, n) __builtin_memcpy(t, f, n) ^ ../drivers/crypto/chelsio/chcr_ktls.c:497:22: note: in expansion of macro 'sk_v6_daddr' memcpy(daaddr, sk->sk_v6_daddr.in6_u.u6_addr8, 16); ^~~~~~~~~~~ -- ~Randy Reported-by: Randy Dunlap