mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: jarkko@kernel.org,dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: jarkko@kernel.org,bpf@vger.kernel.org,dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,fsverity@lists.linux.dev,keyrings@vger.kernel.org,linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,agk@redhat.com,agordeev@linux.ibm.com,ast@kernel.org,alexs@kernel.org,anastasia.eskova@ibm.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org,andrii@kernel.org,bmarzins@redhat.com,borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,daniel@iogearbox.net,dzm91@hust.edu.cn,eddyz87@gmail.com,emil@etsalapatis.com,ebiggers@kernel.org,ignat@linux.win,hca@linux.ibm.com,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev,James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,jmorris@namei.org,jolsa@kernel.org,corbet@lwn.net,memxor@gmail.com,torvalds@linux-foundation.org,martin.lau@linux.dev,snitzer@kernel.org,mpatocka@redhat.com,zohar@linux.ibm.com,paul@paul-moore.com,oberpar@linux.ibm.com,rdunlap@infradead.org,roberto.sassu@huawei.com,serge@hallyn.com,skhan@linuxfoundation.org,song@kernel.org,svens@linux.ibm.com,tytso@mit.edu,gor@linux.ibm.com,
	si.yanteng@linux.dev,yonghong.song@linux.dev,stable@vger.kernel.org,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,mason@kernel.org,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/6] s390/cert_store: Pin the user session keyring
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 16:51:43 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <caabf5117f03756c1c1b478d2a802c2a188996dde73545bbc552b6093484d557@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114161211.376859-2-jarkko@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2568 bytes --]

> s390/cert_store: Pin the user session keyring

TL;DR: Commit message only: the stable tag should be v6.6+, not v6.1+, and the
changelog's keyring-lifetime reason looks inaccurate. It also omits the new
ERR_PTR handling. The code change looks worthwhile.

>     s390/cert_store: Pin the user session keyring
>
>     The user session keyring stays alive only because the session keyring is
>     pinned by current_cred().
>
>     Pin the reference at:
>
>     1. find_cs_keyring()
>     2. cleanup_cs_keys()
>     3. create_cs_keyring()
>
>     Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>     Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.1+
>     Fixes: 8cf57d7217c3 ("s390: add support for user-defined certificates")
>     Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

The stable tag says "# v6.1+", but the commit named in Fixes: is not in
v6.1.  8cf57d7217c3 is contained in v6.6 and not in v6.5, and
arch/s390/kernel/cert_store.c does not exist in v6.1 through v6.5, so there
is nothing to backport there.

The other patches in this series that fix the same commit use "# v6.6+".
Should this be:

  Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+

The changelog says the user session keyring stays alive only because the
session keyring is pinned by current_cred().  Is that accurate?

look_up_user_keyrings() links the user session keyring into the per-user_ns
register:

    ret = key_link(reg_keyring, session_keyring);

and get_user_register() notes that "the keyring is pinned by the user_ns".
That link is what normally keeps it alive.

cred->session_keyring is usually a different keyring, either a "_ses"
keyring from join_session_keyring() or pam_keyinit, or NULL.  It is the user
session keyring only when install_session_keyring(user_session) happened to
run for that process.

The change itself looks worthwhile, since the owner has KEY_USR_ALL on that
keyring and can revoke or invalidate it, after which keyring_gc() can drop
the register link while cert_store still uses the pointer.  Could the
changelog give that reason instead?

The changelog also does not mention that the three callers now handle an
ERR_PTR return from get_user_session_keyring().  Before this patch that
ERR_PTR was passed straight into keyring_search(), key_unlink() and
keyring_alloc(), which dereference keyring->type.  Could that be described
as well?


---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/43615900108

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-14 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-14 16:12 [PATCH v11 0/6] KEYS: Replace assoc_array with Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-14 16:12 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] s390/cert_store: Pin the user session keyring Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-14 16:51   ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2026-11-14 16:12 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] s390/cert_store: Return an owned reference from find_cs_keyring() Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-14 16:51   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-14 16:12 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] s390/cert_store: Skip keys that disappeared during invalidation Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-14 16:12 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] KEYS: Introduce keyring_is_empty() Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-14 16:12 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] KEYS: Replace assoc_array with rhashtable Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-11-14 17:04   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-11-14 16:12 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] lib: Remove assoc_array Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=caabf5117f03756c1c1b478d2a802c2a188996dde73545bbc552b6093484d557@mail.kernel.org \
    --to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexs@kernel.org \
    --cc=anastasia.eskova@ibm.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=dzm91@hust.edu.cn \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ignat@linux.win \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=si.yanteng@linux.dev \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®