mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siddh Raman Pant <siddh.raman.pant@oracle.com>
To: "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	Mark Tinguely <mark.tinguely@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 6.1 v2 4/5] xfs: factor out stale buffer item completion
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:08:31 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cabb67cea29e57cccc9dedfd87c57dced80e0122.1791883290.git.siddh.raman.pant@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1791883290.git.siddh.raman.pant@oracle.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

The stale buffer item completion handling is currently only done
from BLI unpinning. We need to perform this function from where-ever
the last reference to the BLI is dropped, so first we need to
factor this code out into a helper.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 816c330b605c3f4813c0dc0ab5af5cce17ff06b3)
Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant <siddh.raman.pant@oracle.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
index 1b323b3c0eb9..ade89a233e68 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
@@ -541,6 +541,42 @@ xfs_buf_item_pin(
 	atomic_inc(&bip->bli_buf->b_pin_count);
 }
 
+/*
+ * For a stale BLI, process all the necessary completions that must be
+ * performed when the final BLI reference goes away. The buffer will be
+ * referenced and locked here - we return to the caller with the buffer still
+ * referenced and locked for them to finalise processing of the buffer.
+ */
+static void
+xfs_buf_item_finish_stale(
+	struct xfs_buf_log_item	*bip)
+{
+	struct xfs_buf		*bp = bip->bli_buf;
+	struct xfs_log_item	*lip = &bip->bli_item;
+
+	ASSERT(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE);
+	ASSERT(xfs_buf_islocked(bp));
+	ASSERT(bp->b_flags & XBF_STALE);
+	ASSERT(bip->__bli_format.blf_flags & XFS_BLF_CANCEL);
+	ASSERT(list_empty(&lip->li_trans));
+	ASSERT(!bp->b_transp);
+
+	if (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE_INODE) {
+		xfs_buf_item_done(bp);
+		xfs_buf_inode_iodone(bp);
+		ASSERT(list_empty(&bp->b_li_list));
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * We may or may not be on the AIL here, xfs_trans_ail_delete() will do
+	 * the right thing regardless of the situation in which we are called.
+	 */
+	xfs_trans_ail_delete(lip, SHUTDOWN_LOG_IO_ERROR);
+	xfs_buf_item_relse(bip);
+	ASSERT(bp->b_log_item == NULL);
+}
+
 /*
  * This is called to unpin the buffer associated with the buf log item which was
  * previously pinned with a call to xfs_buf_item_pin().  We enter this function
@@ -590,13 +626,6 @@ xfs_buf_item_unpin(
 	}
 
 	if (stale) {
-		ASSERT(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE);
-		ASSERT(xfs_buf_islocked(bp));
-		ASSERT(bp->b_flags & XBF_STALE);
-		ASSERT(bip->__bli_format.blf_flags & XFS_BLF_CANCEL);
-		ASSERT(list_empty(&lip->li_trans));
-		ASSERT(!bp->b_transp);
-
 		trace_xfs_buf_item_unpin_stale(bip);
 
 		/*
@@ -607,22 +636,7 @@ xfs_buf_item_unpin(
 		 * processing is complete.
 		 */
 		xfs_buf_rele(bp);
-
-		/*
-		 * If we get called here because of an IO error, we may or may
-		 * not have the item on the AIL. xfs_trans_ail_delete() will
-		 * take care of that situation. xfs_trans_ail_delete() drops
-		 * the AIL lock.
-		 */
-		if (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE_INODE) {
-			xfs_buf_item_done(bp);
-			xfs_buf_inode_iodone(bp);
-			ASSERT(list_empty(&bp->b_li_list));
-		} else {
-			xfs_trans_ail_delete(lip, SHUTDOWN_LOG_IO_ERROR);
-			xfs_buf_item_relse(bip);
-			ASSERT(bp->b_log_item == NULL);
-		}
+		xfs_buf_item_finish_stale(bip);
 		xfs_buf_relse(bp);
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13  9:38 [PATCH RESEND 6.1 v2 0/5] Backport of XFS umount hang fixes Siddh Raman Pant
2026-10-13  9:38 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 v2 1/5] xfs: xfs_ifree_cluster vs xfs_iflush_shutdown_abort deadlock Siddh Raman Pant
2026-10-13  9:38 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 v2 2/5] xfs: catch stale AGF/AGF metadata Siddh Raman Pant
2026-10-13  9:38 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 v2 3/5] xfs: rearrange code in xfs_buf_item.c Siddh Raman Pant
2026-10-13  9:38 ` Siddh Raman Pant [this message]
2026-10-13  9:38 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 v2 5/5] xfs: fix unmount hang with unflushable inodes stuck in the AIL Siddh Raman Pant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cabb67cea29e57cccc9dedfd87c57dced80e0122.1791883290.git.siddh.raman.pant@oracle.com \
    --to=siddh.raman.pant@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.tinguely@oracle.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®