From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753523AbdBTNxw (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:53:52 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51217 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752726AbdBTNxt (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:53:49 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Documentation: devicetree: arm: Document Marvell IAP140 To: Thomas Petazzoni References: <20170219032000.4674-1-afaerber@suse.de> <20170219032000.4674-3-afaerber@suse.de> <20170220135646.2b0219c1@free-electrons.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jisheng Zhang , Andrew Lunn , Eric Miao , Jason Cooper , info@andromedabox.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haojian Zhuang , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Gregory Clement , Mark Rutland , Robert Jarzmik , Daniel Mack , Sebastian Hesselbarth From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Organization: SUSE Linux GmbH Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:16:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170220135646.2b0219c1@free-electrons.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Am 20.02.2017 um 13:56 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 04:19:58 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> + - compatible : must contain "mrvl,iap140" > > Even though there's indeed a good number of existing "mrvl," compatible > strings in the tree, the official vendor prefix according to > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt is "marvell". > Probably you should use that instead for new bindings? I'm confused now. According to Marvell IR [0] they are NASDAQ-listed as MRVL. My understanding is that in that case the official vendor prefix becomes mrvl. Why not here? Would be good to understand for other pending vendors such as Actions Semi. Any comments on the iap140 vs. pxa1908 naming? The Communication Processors section has disappeared from marvell.com, so I couldn't verify whether IAP140 was renamed from PXA1908 or whether both coexist and we should add a second compatible string here? Thanks, Andreas [0] http://investor.marvell.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=120802&p=irol-irhome -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)