From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rcu:dev.2019.03.20b 54/83] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_process.c:50:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DEFINE_SRCU'
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:32:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cad8bc52-a3ab-0d4e-bb13-c436510f684b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190327195726.GF4102@linux.ibm.com>
On 3/28/19 3:57 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 02:34:27AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev.2019.03.20b
>> head: 6d4434b4b4df791620743178e1419de882b44c7b
>> commit: eb89abcb30733e3a2343dda23cb6d81cc17c60b3 [54/83] rcu: Forbid DEFINE{,_STATIC}_SRCU() from modules
>> config: x86_64-randconfig-b0-03250021 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
>> reproduce:
>> git checkout eb89abcb30733e3a2343dda23cb6d81cc17c60b3
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> make ARCH=x86_64
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_process.c:50:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
>> DEFINE_SRCU(kfd_processes_srcu);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_process.c:50:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DEFINE_SRCU' [-Werror=implicit-int]
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_process.c:50:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> I don't have that hardware, but does the following help? (It at least
> builds for me, but your mileage may vary.)
>
> Thanx, Paul
Yes, the patch works for kbuild robot.
Thanks,
Rong Chen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit b30be5a76070402912437fa23b43de11cb1973f4
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed Mar 27 12:53:36 2019 -0700
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd: Dynamically allocate kfd_processes_srcu
>
> Having DEFINE_SRCU() or DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() in a loadable module
> requires that the size of the reserved region be increased, which is
> not something we really want to be doing. This commit therefore removes
> the DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c in
> favor of defining kfd_processes_srcu as a simple srcu_struct, initializing
> it in amdgpu_amdkfd_init(), and cleaning it up in amdgpu_amdkfd_fini().
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com
> Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
> index fe1d7368c1e6..eadb20dee867 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/dma-buf.h>
>
> +extern struct srcu_struct kfd_processes_srcu;
> +
> static const unsigned int compute_vmid_bitmap = 0xFF00;
>
> /* Total memory size in system memory and all GPU VRAM. Used to
> @@ -40,6 +42,8 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_init(void)
> struct sysinfo si;
> int ret;
>
> + ret = init_srcu_struct(&kfd_processes_srcu);
> + WARN_ON(ret);
> si_meminfo(&si);
> amdgpu_amdkfd_total_mem_size = si.totalram - si.totalhigh;
> amdgpu_amdkfd_total_mem_size *= si.mem_unit;
> @@ -57,6 +61,7 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_init(void)
> void amdgpu_amdkfd_fini(void)
> {
> kgd2kfd_exit();
> + cleanup_srcu_struct(&kfd_processes_srcu);
> }
>
> void amdgpu_amdkfd_device_probe(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> index 4bdae78bab8e..98b694068b8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct mm_struct;
> DEFINE_HASHTABLE(kfd_processes_table, KFD_PROCESS_TABLE_SIZE);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(kfd_processes_mutex);
>
> -DEFINE_SRCU(kfd_processes_srcu);
> +struct srcu_struct kfd_processes_srcu;
>
> /* For process termination handling */
> static struct workqueue_struct *kfd_process_wq;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-24 18:34 kbuild test robot
2019-03-27 19:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-04-02 0:32 ` Rong Chen [this message]
2019-04-02 13:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-04-02 13:50 ` Rong Chen
2019-04-02 14:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cad8bc52-a3ab-0d4e-bb13-c436510f684b@intel.com \
--to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome