From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9304023D7F3 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 01:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762306818; cv=none; b=CFe5e1qc8xpMsp/s4eJUMDA3KKQdBQxUEfDotEMJTai3C7hEtha0j7duSDRVMelNdMp3dTFPipIAOhslMh1AN0ruBQ1in7OgbmxUhwyJsnxe65+CNoWvZEDO9cYBaDKcRTqzMcH4YdHfhrmXeLfP9mS0ut1p5gRRa8tsm+i0h+k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762306818; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GqDi5GkFAwbTiD5BQkfKO8wmpRw7mEjoIkWIofJtPwQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WtM9COIQyEXXVlqMTgYhvKoaNqgndFAqNR7OOAuWhSeUkZIDcuUlNt5LNukCFVG+Tji7UbjF4gxviSKo5rR9E/TSDzkKMF2SppMt72jSh4BCW4HgIi1Vtecu1MqbgMPTMuQWrHwW3svyl+kKZGcgJ/Y06Vxu1BKE9DFDkdaZAvA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=Mfs0e/ft; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="Mfs0e/ft" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1762306812; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=KAltNraqZrxDP4Z4ttzZmN1l8i6KuuWtzoXbQ1bixls=; b=Mfs0e/ftP6PMZAtK2BtCeDbHGouteEvhkuB8Nqp3YR5YbaYQb9TF8lBALwXZ5QfQQJ+Q+O5KgZF1i+g9mcCPCe9/UeGFikN31Hb48jZpOV6lTdKDaBbY+uuU6OAIe8iVqDVj7VRxKmmW/w8aYPPs0xYH6D3v9pJPtu2ZqGmEr2c= Received: from 30.50.176.188(mailfrom:joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WrjCNa9_1762306811 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Wed, 05 Nov 2025 09:40:12 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 09:40:11 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC RFT PATCH] ocfs2: Mark inode bad upon validation failure during read To: Ahmet Eray Karadag , ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev Cc: Albin Babu Varghese , mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heming Zhao , david.hunter.linux@gmail.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, syzbot+b93b65ee321c97861072@syzkaller.appspotmail.com References: <20251029225748.11361-2-eraykrdg1@gmail.com> From: Joseph Qi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2025/11/5 06:31, Ahmet Eray Karadag wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm having some trouble getting xfstests-dev set up to test some ocfs2 > changes. I can't seem to get the configuration working correctly to run > the ocfs2 test group. > > Could anyone share some insights or pointers on the proper setup? Any > help would be much appreciated. > The basic steps is: 1. Configure a ocfs2 cluster, e.g: $ cat /etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf cluster: heartbeat_mode = local node_count = 1 name = ocfs2cluster node: number = 0 cluster = ocfs2cluster ip_port = 7777 ip_address = 127.0.0.1 name = localhost 2. Online ocfs2 cluster: $ /etc/init.d/o2cb.init online 3. Then run xfstests cases, e.g.: $ ./check generic/001 Actually we prefer ocfs2tests to test ocfs2, which can be cloned at: https://github.com/markfasheh/ocfs2-test Thanks, Joseph