From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: xukuohai@huaweicloud.com,bpf@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,andrii@kernel.org,martin.lau@linux.dev,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,puranjay@kernel.org,a.s.protopopov@gmail.com,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,clm@meta.com,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/5] bpf: Move JIT for single-subprog programs to verifier
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 10:46:43 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cae8a7cfe54f2f1f66bde10df2026eb2c1076998bef9e483b513abd3bb5722c3@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260302102726.1126019-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2674 bytes --]
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index fc4ccd1de569..ab2bc0850770 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -26086,6 +26086,11 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u3
> convert_pseudo_ld_imm64(env);
> }
>
> + /* constants blinding in the JIT may increase prog->len */
> + len = env->prog->len;
> + if (env->subprog_cnt == 1)
> + env->prog = bpf_prog_select_jit(env->prog, &ret);
> +
> adjust_btf_func(env);
>
> err_release_maps:
[ ... ]
> @@ -26111,7 +26116,7 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u3
> err_unlock:
> if (!is_priv)
> mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock);
> - clear_insn_aux_data(env, 0, env->prog->len);
> + clear_insn_aux_data(env, 0, len);
> vfree(env->insn_aux_data);
Can the len variable be stale when reaching clear_insn_aux_data()
through an error path?
At the top of bpf_check(), len is first assigned as:
len = (*prog)->len;
This original value is used to allocate insn_aux_data. Later,
instruction rewriting passes like convert_ctx_accesses() and
do_misc_fixups() can change env->prog->len and resize
insn_aux_data to match via bpf_patch_insn_data().
The second assignment added by this patch:
len = env->prog->len;
is only reached on the success path, after all instruction
rewriting and after the maps/btfs allocation. If an error occurs
between the rewriting passes and this reassignment, for example
bpf_vlog_finalize() returning an error, copy_to_bpfptr_offset()
failing, or kmalloc for used_maps/used_btfs failing, the code
jumps to err_release_maps and eventually reaches
clear_insn_aux_data(env, 0, len) with the original program length
rather than the current post-rewriting length.
If rewriting increased env->prog->len (the common case for
programs with context accesses), the iteration stops short of
the actual insn_aux_data size, potentially leaking jt fields in
the unvisited entries.
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/22571297111
AI-authorship-score: low
AI-authorship-explanation: Standard kernel refactoring by a known BPF contributor with non-native English patterns in the commit message.
issues-found: 1
issue-severity-score: low
issue-severity-explanation: Stale len variable in bpf_check error paths can cause insn_aux_data jt field memory leaks when instruction rewriting changed prog->len before an error between rewriting and the len reassignment.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 10:27 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/5] emit ENDBR/BTI instructions for indirect jump targets Xu Kuohai
2026-03-02 10:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/5] bpf: Move JIT for single-subprog programs to verifier Xu Kuohai
2026-03-02 10:46 ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2026-03-03 2:28 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-03-04 6:05 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-03-04 12:22 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-03-02 10:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/5] bpf: Pass bpf_verifier_env to jit Xu Kuohai
2026-03-02 10:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/5] bpf: Add helper to detect indirect jump targets Xu Kuohai
2026-03-03 17:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-03-04 12:45 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-03-04 15:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-03-05 3:47 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-03-05 3:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-03-02 10:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/5] bpf, x86: Emit ENDBR for " Xu Kuohai
2026-03-04 6:23 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-03-04 13:03 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-03-05 6:38 ` kernel test robot
2026-03-02 10:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/5] bpf, arm64: Emit BTI for indirect jump target Xu Kuohai
2026-03-03 16:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/5] emit ENDBR/BTI instructions for indirect jump targets Alexis Lothoré
2026-03-04 12:11 ` Xu Kuohai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cae8a7cfe54f2f1f66bde10df2026eb2c1076998bef9e483b513abd3bb5722c3@mail.kernel.org \
--to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®